mirror of
https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy.git
synced 2026-04-26 16:15:51 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #817] Suggested improvements to README regarding bug reports #505
Labels
No labels
api-bug
bug
dependencies
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
external-ide
headless-mode
implicit-grant-flow
invalid
missing-endpoint
pr-welcome
private-api
pull-request
question
spotipy3
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/spotipy#505
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Spencer-Wise on GitHub (Jun 2, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy/issues/817
I am taking a class on Open Source Software, and for this class I had to review documentation for an open source project and suggest improvements. I looked at Spotipy's documentation and wrote a report detailing recommendations for ways to improve the visibility and completeness of the README's Bug Report section. This report is attached. Specifically, it suggests:
More details for each section can be found in the attached report.
Each of these recommendations would ideally help users submit higher quality bug reports, saving the devs time and effort in tracking down and fixing bugs.
It's worth noting, while my report focuses on the README, all of these recommendations could be applied to the readthedocs website, as well, as the bug reporting section of the website faces the same perceived issues as the README.
report2supplement.pdf
@stephanebruckert commented on GitHub (Jul 9, 2024):
More information is already given once you click on "New Issue" https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy/issues/new/choose
https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy/tree/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE