mirror of
https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy.git
synced 2026-04-27 16:45:52 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #606] Will spotify new web api screw up spotipy? general question. #361
Labels
No labels
api-bug
bug
dependencies
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
external-ide
headless-mode
implicit-grant-flow
invalid
missing-endpoint
pr-welcome
private-api
pull-request
question
spotipy3
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/spotipy#361
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @greeneryAO on GitHub (Nov 10, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy/issues/606
I have a guy who I paid money to, to make me python 3 scripts for some playlisting functions in spotipy because I don't know how, wish I did, maybe one day I'll learn. Anyway, it worked out ok but I don't know what exactly he did.
I noticed spotify has a beta api, I have more projects for him but if the new web api changes something substantial I might be throwing my money away. It's not the best way to get things done and not the cheapest but I'm not a coder and I have complex ideas for spotify so that's how it is.
just curious, because if I can't get a hold of him one day and his scripts no longer work that's really crappy, stack overflow certainly is not going to help me.
thanks.
@Peter-Schorn commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2020):
Is this the website you are referring to: https://developer.spotify.com/documentation/web-api/reference-beta/ ?
If so, don't worry; Spotify is creating a new documentation website. Their web API is not changing.
@greeneryAO commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2020):
yeah that's the one, I guess I saw check out our new beta api and assumed it was the web api and didn't investigate further, thanks for the clarification 🙂