starred/spotipy
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy.git synced 2026-04-27 08:35:49 +03:00
Code Issues 62 Projects Releases 10 Packages Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #57] Add market as keyword to search #30

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-27 23:20:28 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments
kerem commented 2026-02-27 23:20:28 +03:00
Owner
Copy link

Originally created by @robroc on GitHub (Jun 8, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy/issues/57

The Spotify API allows you to specify the market in the search function, and to specify if the market should be inferred from the auth token:
https://developer.spotify.com/web-api/search-item/

It would be nice to have this feature in Spotipy.

Originally created by @robroc on GitHub (Jun 8, 2015). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/spotipy-dev/spotipy/issues/57 The Spotify API allows you to specify the market in the search function, and to specify if the market should be inferred from the auth token: https://developer.spotify.com/web-api/search-item/ It would be nice to have this feature in Spotipy.
kerem closed this issue 2026-02-27 23:20:28 +03:00
kerem commented 2026-02-27 23:20:29 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@guspersson commented on GitHub (May 16, 2016):

Until the feature is added, you can modify client.py and add market to the search function on row 324:
return self._get('search', q=q, limit=limit, offset=offset, type=type, market='SE')

<!-- gh-comment-id:219434897 --> @guspersson commented on GitHub (May 16, 2016): Until the feature is added, you can modify `client.py` and add market to the search function on row 324: `return self._get('search', q=q, limit=limit, offset=offset, type=type, market='SE')`
kerem commented 2026-02-27 23:20:29 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@jscholes commented on GitHub (May 27, 2016):

Why is this ticket still open almost one year later? It seems like this is a pretty simple change, with a pull request to boot.

<!-- gh-comment-id:222122944 --> @jscholes commented on GitHub (May 27, 2016): Why is this ticket still open almost one year later? It seems like this is a pretty simple change, with a pull request to boot.
kerem commented 2026-02-27 23:20:29 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@brki commented on GitHub (Jun 5, 2016):

I would also find this useful.

<!-- gh-comment-id:223801664 --> @brki commented on GitHub (Jun 5, 2016): I would also find this useful.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
master
feature/2026-02-changes
feature/invalid-uri-warning
feature/refresh-endpoints
doc-deprecations
revert-synchronize
v3
run-tests
bugfix/1149-change-cache-name
2.23.0
v3_oldprsonly
2.26.0
2.25.2
2.25.1
2.25.0
2.24.0
2.23.0
2.22.1
2.22.0
2.21.0
2.20.0
2.19.0
2.18.0
2.17.1
2.17.0
2.16.1
2.16.0
2.15.0
2.14.0
2.13.0
2.12.0
2.11.2
2.11.1
2.11.0
2.10.0
2.9.0
2.8.0
2.7.1
2.7.0
2.6.3
2.6.2
2.6.1
2.6.0
2.5.0
Labels
Clear labels   
api-bug

   
bug

   
dependencies

   
documentation

   
duplicate

   
enhancement

   
external-ide

   
headless-mode

   
implicit-grant-flow

   
invalid

   
missing-endpoint

   
pr-welcome

   
private-api

   
pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

  
question

   
spotipy3

   
wontfix
No labels
api-bug
bug
dependencies
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
external-ide
headless-mode
implicit-grant-flow
invalid
missing-endpoint
pr-welcome
private-api
pull-request
question
spotipy3
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/spotipy#30
No description provided.