mirror of
https://github.com/probberechts/soccerdata.git
synced 2026-04-25 10:05:53 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #259] [WhoScored] "qualifiers" and "satisfiedEventsTypes" definition list #50
Labels
No labels
ESPN
FBref
FotMob
MatchHistory
SoFIFA
Sofascore
WhoScored
WhoScored
bug
build
common
dependencies
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
invalid
performance
pull-request
question
question
removal
understat
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/soccerdata#50
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @randomcrit2020 on GitHub (Jun 7, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/probberechts/soccerdata/issues/259
Is there a list of definitions of "qualifiers" and "satisfiedEventsTypes" for the whoscored data ? for example, I'm trying to know what does the following list means.
"satisfiedEventsTypes": [
91,
212,
36,
37,
217
],
@probberechts commented on GitHub (Jun 8, 2023):
Here is a list with qualifiers: https://github.com/tomh05/football-scores/blob/master/data/reference/opta-qualifiers.json
I am not entirely sure what the "satisfiedEventTypes" are, but I believe they are used to tag events with subcategories such as "blocked shot", "shot off target", ... I believe you can infer the same from a combination of the action type, action result, and qualifiers. I've never used the "satisfiedEventTypes" attribute.
@randomcrit2020 commented on GitHub (Jun 12, 2023):
I found
github.com/jokecamp/FootballData@7865378fe9/random_docs/Opta Playground- F24 documentation.docxandgithub.com/jokecamp/FootballData@7865378fe9/random_docs/Opta-f24_appendices.docxbut I wonder if there is anything newer.@probberechts commented on GitHub (Jun 12, 2023):
Thanks for sharing. I am not aware of anything that is more up-to-date.