mirror of
https://github.com/jberkel/sms-backup-plus.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:05:59 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #355] Customise name/email of self #294
Labels
No labels
AM+RCS
FAQ
awaiting response
backup
bespoke
bug
calendar
call log
cannot reproduce
cloudless
device-specific
documentation
dual- & multi-SIM
duplicate
feature-request
fixed in beta
good first issue
half-missing
help wanted
helpful
meta
misattribution
mms
other message sources
pull-request
question
rejuvenation
restore
schedule
security
stale
task
thanks
v1.5.1
v1.5.10
v1.5.11
v1.5.2
v1.5.3
v1.5.3
v1.5.4
v1.5.4
v1.5.5
v1.5.5
v1.5.6
v1.5.7
v1.5.8
v1.5.9
v1.6β
xoauth
~$ bounty $~
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/sms-backup-plus-jberkel#294
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @MartyMcMartface on GitHub (Aug 3, 2013).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jberkel/sms-backup-plus/issues/355
SMS Backup+ doesn't seem to let me configure a name and/or alternative email address to represent myself. It is hard coded to use the gmail address that is used as the IMAP store.
I use a fairly obscure gmail account for this purpose, so I would like to be able to at least set it to use my name.
For example, an incoming text message is converted to an email From:"Name (phone)" phone@unknown.email, To: myobscureaccount@gmail.com. I'd like to be able to configure it so the To address is "Martin" mynormalemailaddress@gmail.com, or at least just configure the name.
Would you mind implementing that as an enhancement?
Thanks for a great little app.
Regards
Martin
@jberkel commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2014):
sorry!
https://github.com/jberkel/sms-backup-plus#can-you-add-feature-x-
@MartyMcMartface commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2014):
OK no worries. I just saw you make the source available so I might see if I can get it implemented myself one day.