[GH-ISSUE #90] Current develop #57

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-26 01:33:00 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-02-26 01:33:00 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @therden on GitHub (Mar 21, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jeffknupp/sandman2/issues/90

I noticed that you recently began working on Sandman2 again, and thought that it might therefore be okay to ask: Is having Sandman2 achieve feature parity with Sandman still a goal, or have you concluded in the intervening years that the features of the original which it lacks are not worth having, or...?

(I'm wondering because I find it confusing that the original Sandman repo's README identifies that version as "obsolete" while Sandman2's README indicates that it has an incomplete feature set compared to the first.)

Originally created by @therden on GitHub (Mar 21, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jeffknupp/sandman2/issues/90 I noticed that you recently began working on `Sandman2` again, and thought that it might therefore be okay to ask: Is having `Sandman2` achieve feature parity with `Sandman` still a goal, or have you concluded in the intervening years that the features of the original which it lacks are not worth having, or...? (I'm wondering because I find it confusing that the original `Sandman` repo's README identifies that version as "obsolete" while `Sandman2`'s README indicates that it has an incomplete feature set compared to the first.)

kerem closed this issue

2026-02-26 01:33:00 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-26 01:33:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jeffknupp commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019):

I'll update the README. sandman2 has long ago passed the feature set of sandman.

@jeffknupp commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019): I'll update the README. `sandman2` has long ago passed the feature set of `sandman`.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-26 01:33:15 +03:00

[PR #57] [MERGED] adding documentation link at the bottom of readme #112