mirror of
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.git
synced 2026-04-25 21:35:58 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1611] [Question]multiple clients mounting the same bucket #847
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
dataloss
duplicate
enhancement
feature request
help wanted
invalid
need info
performance
pull-request
question
question
testing
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/s3fs-fuse#847
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @GoTheExtraMile on GitHub (Mar 26, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/1611
Hi !
in limitations your say :
`
`
Can I think that when using Amazon storage, it is highly consistent for multiple clients to mount the same bucket?
@gaul commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2021):
s3fs has other sources of inconsistency due to caching. For example, if client1 calls stat on a file then client2 appends to it, client1 will see the old metadata until
stat_cache_expireexpires, by default 900 seconds. Even if you reduce this to 0 there is no coordination between the s3fs clients. Further s3fs has close-to-open semantics meaning that client1's writes will not be published to client2 until a close or fsync. In other network file systems like SMB2, a client can create leases to files which ensures that other clients cannot access them until the lease expires or is revoked.@GoTheExtraMile commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2021):
thanks