[GH-ISSUE #1297] Investigate ossfs fork #695

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-04 01:47:59 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:47:59 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @gaul on GitHub (May 24, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/1297

ossfs forked s3fs version 1.79 and has maintained this for several years. I am unsure about the project's motivations as the Alibaba API seems broadly S3 compatible. It appears that the project mostly renamed functions and cherry-picked from s3fs but there are some good commits that we could borrow, e.g., #1296. References aliyun/ossfs#128.

Originally created by @gaul on GitHub (May 24, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/1297 ossfs forked s3fs version 1.79 and has maintained this for several years. I am unsure about the project's motivations as the Alibaba API seems broadly S3 compatible. It appears that the project mostly renamed functions and cherry-picked from s3fs but there are some good commits that we could borrow, e.g., #1296. References aliyun/ossfs#128.

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-04 01:47:59 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:48:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@gaul commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2020):

Similarly, cosfs seems to have forked from ossfs. References tencentyun/cosfs#39.

@gaul commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2020): Similarly, cosfs seems to have forked from ossfs. References tencentyun/cosfs#39.

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:48:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@gaul commented on GitHub (Oct 10, 2020):

It seems that these FUSE filesystems are out of date. s3fs supports both ossfs and cosfs and we encourage users to migrate to s3fs.

@gaul commented on GitHub (Oct 10, 2020): It seems that these FUSE filesystems are out of date. s3fs supports both ossfs and cosfs and we encourage users to migrate to s3fs.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-04 02:01:18 +03:00

[PR #695] [MERGED] fix condition for parallel download #1609