[GH-ISSUE #1298] Remove references to Amazon S3 #694

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-04 01:47:59 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:47:59 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @gaul on GitHub (May 24, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/1298

s3fs works with a variety of S3 implementations and it should avoid specifying Amazon S3 when not necessary.

Originally created by @gaul on GitHub (May 24, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/1298 s3fs works with a variety of S3 implementations and it should avoid specifying Amazon S3 when not necessary.

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:48:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (May 24, 2020):

Should we check the hard-coded parts for AWS S3 (codes that cannot be specified with options)?
For distributed storage that is compatible with S3, I think it's working fine right now, but is it related to not working on Alibaba?

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (May 24, 2020): Should we check the hard-coded parts for AWS S3 (codes that cannot be specified with options)? For distributed storage that is compatible with S3, I think it's working fine right now, but is it related to not working on Alibaba?

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:48:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@gaul commented on GitHub (May 24, 2020):

I think it is fine to keep the default Amazon configuration and documentation links. But some references are not needed and may discourage users who think s3fs is Amazon-only.

@gaul commented on GitHub (May 24, 2020): I think it is fine to keep the default Amazon configuration and documentation links. But some references are not needed and may discourage users who think s3fs is Amazon-only.