mirror of
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.git
synced 2026-04-25 21:35:58 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #108] interoperability / Permissions with other tools #66
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
dataloss
duplicate
enhancement
feature request
help wanted
invalid
need info
performance
pull-request
question
question
testing
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/s3fs-fuse#66
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @nzjrs on GitHub (Jan 21, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/108
Files uploaded with s3cmd / s4cmd are not readable by s3fs-fuse. Is this a bug or a permissions issue.
Both tools were using root credentials and no IAM stuff. The documentation here is quite poor to help understand this sort of problem.
@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2015):
I'm sorry for replying late.
I think that the problem maybe the reason that objects on S3 do not have a-amz-meta-* headers.
s3fs uses a-amz-meta-* headers, those points the file attributes about mode/uid/gid/mtime.
Then you could not access the objects, you can do two way.
One is that you set these header to all object, the other you run s3fs with umusk and uid and gid options.
If you run s3fs with umask/gid/uid and you modify the object(file/directory), these object will have those headers.
(When you modify the object through s3fs, then the object is set those header by s3fs.)
Last, I'm sorry about poor documentation about s3fs now.
If you find a bug/problem, please post new issue.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
@nzjrs commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2015):
Ok thanks. I also filed this
https://github.com/bloomreach/s4cmd/issues/19
so maybe s4cmd will implement the necessary compatibility headers
@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2015):
@nzjrs Thanks a lot.