mirror of
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.git
synced 2026-04-25 21:35:58 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1227] Can s3fs cache write only ? #655
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
dataloss
duplicate
enhancement
feature request
help wanted
invalid
need info
performance
pull-request
question
question
testing
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/s3fs-fuse#655
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @chunyulin on GitHub (Jan 8, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/1227
Hello, I wonder can s3fs use write cache only, not for read?
A write cache is needed for a FUSE-mount device to do non-sequential write; on the other hand, a non-sequential read seem works w/o a cache anyway(?). So, to suppot write-only cache may reduce the local disk IO when reading. Is it true?