mirror of
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.git
synced 2026-04-25 13:26:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #785] Fedora packaging #453
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
dataloss
duplicate
enhancement
feature request
help wanted
invalid
need info
performance
pull-request
question
question
testing
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/s3fs-fuse#453
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @gaul on GitHub (Jul 4, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/785
It would be great if Fedora included
s3fsin its package repository for parity with the Ubuntu package. Can someone step forward to write a spec file and submit it to Red Hat? I found this issue which is open:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292
@dreampuf has a spec file mentioned in #648 but never submitted a pull request.
@juliogonzalez commented on GitHub (Jul 4, 2018):
If you are interested, I think I can take care of it, since I already have https://github.com/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse-rpm, including CI with docker containers.
@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 4, 2018):
@juliogonzalez It would be great if you could get Fedora to include
s3fs!Also it looks like SUSE already packages
s3fs:https://software.opensuse.org/package/s3fs
Could you add installation instructions to our
README.md?@juliogonzalez commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2018):
@gaul, about your request for SUSE and openSUSE, see #789.
I can also temporary add the instructions to use my repository, as it's able to build for Fedora, CentOS/RHEL and Amazon Linux.
About adding the packages to Fedora, please see my comment at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292#c31
I guess we should also submit it to EPEL, to make it available for RHEL7/CentOS7 (as you can see at my repository RHEL6/CentOS6 is another story because of the old FUSE version), and that should make it also available for recent Amazon Linux versions.
@juliogonzalez commented on GitHub (Sep 22, 2018):
I fixed several things after reviewing Fedora doc, see https://github.com/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse-rpm/commits/master (last commits)
Submission is now ready at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988 (provided I did not miss any steps of the looooooooooong procedure for Fedora submissions).
I also added a webhook at https://github.com/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse-rpm, so for each commit for master will be built at copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse/
Koji build is working for the latest copr build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29814931
Now I am waiting for review to see if I need to change anything, and trying to see if I can get a sponsor. I will present myself at Fedora's devel list and we'll see.
@gaul, can you assign this issue to me?
@gaul commented on GitHub (Sep 22, 2018):
Awesome, thank you for pushing this forward!
@juliogonzalez commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2018):
s3fs-fuse is now submitted for:
As soon as the submissions have enough karma, s3fs-fuse should make into F27, F28 and EPEL7.
F29 could take some more time as right now I think it's frozen in Beta state.
@juliogonzalez commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2018):
Good news:
Fedora 27:
Fedora 28:
EPEL7 (test is latest CentOS7):
As I commented before, Fedora 29 will take some more time, as fedora is currently on Beta Freeze state. s3fs-fuse should be added to the update repositories by the end of the month, when Fedora 29 is GA.
For more details, check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule
@gaul commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2018):
@juliogonzalez The packaging is great news; thanks for leading this! This will make s3fs more accessible to users.