[GH-ISSUE #514] File Permission #284

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-04 01:44:02 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:44:02 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @vgadhadaran on GitHub (Dec 12, 2016).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/514

An data with certain level of permission and ownership moved to an HCP /AWS S3 bucket, Can retain the same level while we are retrieving the data? If so, What conditions needs to be set on the bucket or s3fs level?

Originally created by @vgadhadaran on GitHub (Dec 12, 2016). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/514 An data with certain level of permission and ownership moved to an HCP /AWS S3 bucket, Can retain the same level while we are retrieving the data? If so, What conditions needs to be set on the bucket or s3fs level?

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-04 01:44:03 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:44:03 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2017):

@vgadhadaran
Please point out if I misunderstood the meaning of your question.
And about the setting of bucket of HCP I have little premise.

If HCP is compatible with S3, I think that you can read the object uploaded with s3fs without problems.

The reason for this is that s3fs gives the object an attribute in the HTTP header.
If HCP is able to grant HTTP headers to objects, I think that there is no problem.

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2017): @vgadhadaran Please point out if I misunderstood the meaning of your question. And about the setting of bucket of HCP I have little premise. If HCP is compatible with S3, I think that you can read the object uploaded with s3fs without problems. The reason for this is that s3fs gives the object an attribute in the HTTP header. If HCP is able to grant HTTP headers to objects, I think that there is no problem.

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:44:04 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019):

We kept this issue open for a long time.
I will close this, but if the problem persists, please reopen or post a new issue.

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019): We kept this issue open for a long time. I will close this, but if the problem persists, please reopen or post a new issue.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-04 02:01:39 +03:00

[PR #895] [MERGED] Emit more friendly error for buckets with dots #1680