mirror of
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.git
synced 2026-04-25 21:35:58 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #316] Ignore files #165
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
dataloss
duplicate
enhancement
feature request
help wanted
invalid
need info
performance
pull-request
question
question
testing
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/s3fs-fuse#165
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Mambix on GitHub (Dec 9, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/316
Is there a mechanism to ignore certain files?
For example I'm using this for btsync folder and it doesn't need to sync *.bts files to S3 bucket necause they are still beeing synced between machines. Once btsync does it's job it will rename the file and so it will be ready to sync to S3.
@RobbKistler commented on GitHub (Dec 11, 2015):
s3fs-fuse doesn't have a mechanism to do that.
@RobbKistler commented on GitHub (Dec 11, 2015):
You might check out http://filterfs.sourceforge.net. It could work in conjunction with s3fs-fuse to give you the functionality you want. The performance might not be great.
@Mambix commented on GitHub (Dec 11, 2015):
Thanks @RobbKistler that might just work.
It's painfully slow atm, but this might be exactly what I need
@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2015):
@Mambix
@RobbKistler said correct, s3fs does not support the filter of the file directory, because it only supports transparent access to S3 object.
If you can be set to overlap the filterfs and s3fs, it might be realized.
I close this issue, but if you have a problem, please reopen this issue.
Thanks in advance for your help.