[GH-ISSUE #287] unsuccessful "make" #148

Closed
opened 2026-03-04 01:42:38 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @cc13ny on GitHub (Oct 30, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/287

Hi all,
I'm new to s3fs-fuse. After I follow the "Installation" section (on README.md) to do "make", it showed the results as follows, which seems to do nothing because of the message "Nothing to be done for 'all' ".

I'm not sure it is successful or not? If not, what the problems may be?

The system setting are:
Host: Win 8.1 64-bit
Guest: Ubuntu 14.04 on VirtualBox 4.3.30

image

Originally created by @cc13ny on GitHub (Oct 30, 2015). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/287 Hi all, I'm new to s3fs-fuse. After I follow the "Installation" section (on README.md) to do "make", it showed the results as follows, which seems to do nothing because of the message "Nothing to be done for 'all' ". I'm not sure it is successful or not? If not, what the problems may be? The system setting are: Host: Win 8.1 64-bit Guest: Ubuntu 14.04 on VirtualBox 4.3.30 ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1727284/10851081/8b3b950c-7eff-11e5-9afc-b8eaa6424108.png)
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-04 01:42:38 +03:00
Author
Owner

@RobbKistler commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2015):

@chasego make does "incremental builds" -- it won't re-run steps if they aren't necesary. What you pasted looks like the results of running make again after a successful build has already occured. You can verify this by checking for the existence of src/s3fs, which is the executable created by make. You can also ask make to install the s3fs exectuable for you:

sudo make install
<!-- gh-comment-id:152666132 --> @RobbKistler commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2015): @chasego make does "incremental builds" -- it won't re-run steps if they aren't necesary. What you pasted looks like the results of running make again after a successful build has already occured. You can verify this by checking for the existence of `src/s3fs`, which is the executable created by make. You can also ask make to install the s3fs exectuable for you: ``` sudo make install ```
Author
Owner

@cc13ny commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2015):

I verified the existence of src/s3fs

image

Then I typed sudo make install. It seems that there's no problem. But I'd like to make sure because of Nothing to be done. However, based on your explanation, it should be OK.

image

<!-- gh-comment-id:152683640 --> @cc13ny commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2015): I verified the existence of `src/s3fs` ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1727284/10861104/d424e498-7f4b-11e5-9401-c1fd0751b1f9.png) Then I typed `sudo make install`. It seems that there's no problem. But I'd like to make sure because of `Nothing to be done`. However, based on your explanation, it should be OK. ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1727284/10861135/2ab38e1c-7f4d-11e5-9098-669b4c1ec6e2.png)
Author
Owner

@RobbKistler commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2015):

You can force a build

make clean
make
<!-- gh-comment-id:152689352 --> @RobbKistler commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2015): You can force a build ``` make clean make ```
Author
Owner

@cc13ny commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2015):

@RobbKistler Thank your patience for telling me the basics

<!-- gh-comment-id:152736443 --> @cc13ny commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2015): @RobbKistler Thank your patience for telling me the basics
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/s3fs-fuse#148
No description provided.