starred/s3fs-fuse

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.git synced 2026-04-25 13:26:00 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #2216] test_cache_file_stat fails with `-o use_cache` #1123

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-04 01:51:34 +03:00 by kerem · 7 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:51:34 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @gaul on GitHub (Jul 13, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/2216

test_cache_file_stat:

first line(cache file stat) is different: "52025:0" != "52025:26214400"
test_cache_file_stat failed

test_list:

Expected 2 file but got 3
test_list failed

I assume the latter is related to the recent nocompat_dir fix but I checked these more carefully in #2215. Found via ALL_TESTS=1 make -C test/ check.

Originally created by @gaul on GitHub (Jul 13, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/issues/2216 test_cache_file_stat: ``` first line(cache file stat) is different: "52025:0" != "52025:26214400" test_cache_file_stat failed ``` test_list: ``` Expected 2 file but got 3 test_list failed ``` I assume the latter is related to the recent `nocompat_dir` fix but I checked these more carefully in #2215. Found via `ALL_TESTS=1 make -C test/ check`.

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-04 01:51:35 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:51:35 +03:00

Author

Owner

@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 14, 2023):

This still fails even with d0a944fcaa.

@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 14, 2023): This still fails even with d0a944fcaaaef4ed20238b02fd37d9ca9346997e.

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:51:35 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Jul 16, 2023):

@gaul I have not been able to reproduce this.
(ThreadSanitizer errors are summarized in #2220.)
Are there any special steps or environment to reproduce?

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Jul 16, 2023): @gaul I have not been able to reproduce this. _(ThreadSanitizer errors are summarized in #2220.)_ Are there any special steps or environment to reproduce?

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:51:35 +03:00

Author

Owner

@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

I see this symptom with test_cache_file_stat and -o use_cache=${CACHE_DIR}:

first line(cache file stat) is different: "55518:0" != "55518:26214400"
test_cache_file_stat failed
FAIL: test_cache_file_stat

I think test_list only fails because the other test does not clean up.

@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): I see this symptom with `test_cache_file_stat` and `-o use_cache=${CACHE_DIR}`: ``` first line(cache file stat) is different: "55518:0" != "55518:26214400" test_cache_file_stat failed FAIL: test_cache_file_stat ``` I think `test_list` only fails because the other test does not clean up.

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:51:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

@gaul Thanks, but I haven't been able to reproduce it yet.
Please let me know which OS (used for CI test) this error occurs.
Maybe there are conditions different from mine and Github Actions environment.

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): @gaul Thanks, but I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Please let me know which OS (used for CI test) this error occurs. _Maybe there are conditions different from mine and Github Actions environment._

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:51:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

I am running on Fedora 38. Note that you have to run with -o cache the same way as ALL_TESTS=1 does.

@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): I am running on Fedora 38. Note that you have to run with `-o cache` the same way as `ALL_TESTS=1` does.

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:51:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

I tested it with the use_cache option, but I couldn't reproduce it.
Using Github Actions(only some test cases), I tried it on all OSs targeted by CI, and it also passed.
(The branch will be deleted soon, but here's the log of the GithubActions I just ran: https://github.com/ggtakec/s3fs-fuse/actions/runs/5588207318)

@ggtakec commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): I tested it with the `use_cache` option, but I couldn't reproduce it. Using Github Actions(only some test cases), I tried it on all OSs targeted by CI, and it also passed. _(The branch will be deleted soon, but here's the log of the GithubActions I just ran: https://github.com/ggtakec/s3fs-fuse/actions/runs/5588207318)_

kerem commented

2026-03-04 01:51:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

Sorry I think this is a few symptoms but the primary one is something specific about my SELinux config on Fedora 38. Closing this.

@gaul commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): Sorry I think this is a few symptoms but the primary one is something specific about my SELinux config on Fedora 38. Closing this.