[GH-ISSUE #61] [Feature Request] Add Option to Exclude Specific Sites Instead of Selecting All to Include #41

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-02 02:12:54 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:12:54 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @maffmeier on GitHub (May 14, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/rmmagent/issues/61

Description

Currently, when configuring permissions or filters based on Sites (e.g., for scripts, alerts, automation, etc.), the Tactical RMM interface requires users to select all Sites to include, which becomes cumbersome when the goal is simply to exclude a few specific Sites.

Feature Request

Introduce an additional option or toggle to allow excluding specific Sites, rather than selecting all others to include.

Use Case

For organizations managing a large number of Sites, it is much more efficient to exclude a handful of Sites (e.g., test environments or internal-only clients) than to manually select dozens of others. This would greatly improve usability and reduce configuration errors.

Suggested Implementation

Provide a toggle: "Include mode" vs. "Exclude mode"
In "Exclude mode", allow selecting one or more Sites that should be excluded from the current action, script, policy, or permission
Backend and UI logic should then process this accordingly

Benefits

Easier management in large-scale deployments
Reduces complexity and room for misconfiguration
Improves UX by offering a more intuitive way to manage scope

Thank you for considering this improvement!

Originally created by @maffmeier on GitHub (May 14, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/rmmagent/issues/61 ### Description Currently, when configuring permissions or filters based on Sites (e.g., for scripts, alerts, automation, etc.), the Tactical RMM interface requires users to select all Sites to include, which becomes cumbersome when the goal is simply to exclude a few specific Sites. ### Feature Request Introduce an additional option or toggle to allow excluding specific Sites, rather than selecting all others to include. ### Use Case For organizations managing a large number of Sites, it is much more efficient to exclude a handful of Sites (e.g., test environments or internal-only clients) than to manually select dozens of others. This would greatly improve usability and reduce configuration errors. ### Suggested Implementation - Provide a toggle: "Include mode" vs. "Exclude mode" - In "Exclude mode", allow selecting one or more Sites that should be excluded from the current action, script, policy, or permission - Backend and UI logic should then process this accordingly ### Benefits - Easier management in large-scale deployments - Reduces complexity and room for misconfiguration - Improves UX by offering a more intuitive way to manage scope Thank you for considering this improvement!