[GH-ISSUE #49] Feature: Software inventory to also include user context #34

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-02 02:12:51 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:12:51 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @bbrendon on GitHub (May 6, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/rmmagent/issues/49

I think there is an upstream feature request for the go package on this. I researched it a few weeks ago and just brushed it off but last night I found WaveBrowser.

Maybe you can put pressure on them? I found WaveBrowser installed. I would have found it months or years ago if users were included.

EDIT. Is this it? https://github.com/iamacarpet/go-win64api/pull/60

Originally created by @bbrendon on GitHub (May 6, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/rmmagent/issues/49 I think there is an upstream feature request for the go package on this. I researched it a few weeks ago and just brushed it off but last night I found WaveBrowser. Maybe you can put pressure on them? I found WaveBrowser installed. I would have found it months or years ago if users were included. EDIT. Is this it? https://github.com/iamacarpet/go-win64api/pull/60

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:12:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@isv-one commented on GitHub (May 6, 2024):

+1 - An ideal implementation of this could look like another sub-tab under Software, like "System-wide" "User1" "User2" etc

Or a list in the Software tab like

Software
System-wide:
App1
App2
App3
User1:
App4
App5
User2:
App6
App7

so on

@isv-one commented on GitHub (May 6, 2024): +1 - An ideal implementation of this could look like another sub-tab under Software, like "System-wide" "User1" "User2" etc Or a list in the Software tab like Software System-wide: App1 App2 App3 User1: App4 App5 User2: App6 App7 so on

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:12:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@bbrendon commented on GitHub (May 6, 2024):

Honestly I would prefer it all dumped in one list because separating it out would make using the API to find junk software more complicated.

@bbrendon commented on GitHub (May 6, 2024): Honestly I would prefer it all dumped in one list because separating it out would make using the API to find junk software more complicated.

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:12:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@isv-one commented on GitHub (May 6, 2024):

Sure, the exact implementation doesn't specifically matter as long as the capability is there. I would love some kind of label somewhere though so I could see what's what at a glance.

Could be like

Software
App1 - System-wide
App2 - System-wide
App3 - System-wide
App4 - User1 only
App5 - User 2 only
App6 - User1 and User2

Etc

@isv-one commented on GitHub (May 6, 2024): Sure, the exact implementation doesn't specifically matter as long as the capability is there. I would love some kind of label somewhere though so I could see what's what at a glance. Could be like Software App1 - System-wide App2 - System-wide App3 - System-wide App4 - User1 only App5 - User 2 only App6 - User1 and User2 Etc

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:12:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@bbrendon commented on GitHub (May 16, 2024):

Looks like it was merged. Time for white to do his magic?

@bbrendon commented on GitHub (May 16, 2024): Looks like it was merged. Time for white to do his magic?