[GH-ISSUE #162] [Feature]: Switch / support the OpenSpec SDD standard #62

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 10:22:01 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:22:01 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @matbgn on GitHub (Feb 7, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator/issues/162

Use case

Ensure we follow standards instead of reinventing the wheel, ONLY if it's realistic of course.

Proposed solution

Is it feasible / thinkable / wishable to switch to this emerging industry standard?

https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/

Area

CLI

Backend(s) impacted

All

Alternatives considered

No response

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @matbgn on GitHub (Feb 7, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator/issues/162 ### Use case Ensure we follow standards instead of reinventing the wheel, ONLY if it's realistic of course. ### Proposed solution Is it feasible / thinkable / wishable to switch to this emerging industry standard? https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec/ ### Area CLI ### Backend(s) impacted All ### Alternatives considered _No response_ ### Additional context _No response_

kerem

2026-02-27 10:22:01 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement
label

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:22:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@mikeyobrien commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2026):

This is not reinvented. This is what we use internally at Amazon.

See: https://github.com/strands-agents/agent-sop

That said, I don't mind adding this as an option.

@mikeyobrien commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2026): This is not reinvented. This is what we use internally at Amazon. See: https://github.com/strands-agents/agent-sop That said, I don't mind adding this as an option.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:22:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@matbgn commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2026):

My apologies, please ignore this request. I don't won't to add overengineering, just wanted to contribute to the sustainability of this just amazing project. But it makes no sense here as everything is already polished on that side.

Thank you for the enlightenment. 🙏

@matbgn commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2026): My apologies, please ignore this request. I don't won't to add overengineering, just wanted to contribute to the sustainability of this just amazing project. But it makes no sense here as everything is already polished on that side. Thank you for the enlightenment. 🙏

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-27 10:22:17 +03:00

[PR #62] [MERGED] 2.0.0 #117