[GH-ISSUE #113] [Feature request]: Display frequency in addition to bands #35

Closed
opened 2026-02-27 14:38:48 +03:00 by kerem · 7 comments
Owner

Originally created by @hermsi94 on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/iamromulan/quectel-rgmii-toolkit/issues/113

Is it possible to display the frequency in quecmanager in addition to the band used, as described here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_frequency_bands
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G_NR_frequency_bands

? This would make it even easier to assign the frequencies used and you wouldn't always have to look up which frequencies are currently being used in Wikipedia.

Image

Originally created by @hermsi94 on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/iamromulan/quectel-rgmii-toolkit/issues/113 Is it possible to display the frequency in quecmanager in addition to the band used, as described here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_frequency_bands https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G_NR_frequency_bands ? This would make it even easier to assign the frequencies used and you wouldn't always have to look up which frequencies are currently being used in Wikipedia. ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0df02be8-2e7f-433e-81b4-412be43510ca)
kerem closed this issue 2026-02-27 14:38:48 +03:00
Author
Owner

@dgel27 commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025):

The actually frecurency depend on which technology used: tdd, fdd. And it is not just band frequency. The SB frecurency (for NR) is coded in ARFCN. So need implement calculator, like this one:
https://www.cellmapper.net/arfcn
Also, it better implement offline calculator, because private networks usually not connected to internet...

<!-- gh-comment-id:2612408422 --> @dgel27 commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025): The actually frecurency depend on which technology used: tdd, fdd. And it is not just band frequency. The SB frecurency (for NR) is coded in ARFCN. So need implement calculator, like this one: https://www.cellmapper.net/arfcn Also, it better implement offline calculator, because private networks usually not connected to internet...
Author
Owner

@dr-dolomite commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025):

Sorry but I dont think that this feature will be viable or else, reliable in any way. Its not a 1:1 conversion and the modem doesnt provide native and direct information about it except for E/ARFCN. For now, you can use E/ARFCN calculators and it could produce estimations of its frequency.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2612452466 --> @dr-dolomite commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025): Sorry but I dont think that this feature will be viable or else, reliable in any way. Its not a 1:1 conversion and the modem doesnt provide native and direct information about it except for E/ARFCN. For now, you can use E/ARFCN calculators and it could produce estimations of its frequency.
Author
Owner

@hermsi94 commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025):

Sorry but I dont think that this feature will be viable or else, reliable in any way. Its not a 1:1 conversion and the modem doesnt provide native and direct information about it except for E/ARFCN. For now, you can use E/ARFCN calculators and it could produce estimations of its frequency.

Okay. then I'll use the calculator. I didn't know until now that I could get more precise information via the E/ARFCN.

Perhaps a calculator can be integrated offline in quecmanager at some point.

Regards

<!-- gh-comment-id:2612473055 --> @hermsi94 commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025): > Sorry but I dont think that this feature will be viable or else, reliable in any way. Its not a 1:1 conversion and the modem doesnt provide native and direct information about it except for E/ARFCN. For now, you can use E/ARFCN calculators and it could produce estimations of its frequency. Okay. then I'll use the calculator. I didn't know until now that I could get more precise information via the E/ARFCN. Perhaps a calculator can be integrated offline in quecmanager at some point. Regards
Author
Owner

@dr-dolomite commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025):

Sorry but I dont think that this feature will be viable or else, reliable in any way. Its not a 1:1 conversion and the modem doesnt provide native and direct information about it except for E/ARFCN. For now, you can use E/ARFCN calculators and it could produce estimations of its frequency.

Okay. then I'll use the calculator. I didn't know until now that I could get more precise information via the E/ARFCN.

Perhaps a calculator can be integrated offline in quecmanager at some point.

Regards

No problem. I will still consider this and hopefully we can find a good way to implement it on our modem locally.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2612491460 --> @dr-dolomite commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025): > > Sorry but I dont think that this feature will be viable or else, reliable in any way. Its not a 1:1 conversion and the modem doesnt provide native and direct information about it except for E/ARFCN. For now, you can use E/ARFCN calculators and it could produce estimations of its frequency. > > Okay. then I'll use the calculator. I didn't know until now that I could get more precise information via the E/ARFCN. > > Perhaps a calculator can be integrated offline in quecmanager at some point. > > Regards No problem. I will still consider this and hopefully we can find a good way to implement it on our modem locally.
Author
Owner

@dr-dolomite commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025):

NR/E/ARFCN Calculator was added to the latest beta 2.0.1. Closing this now.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2719619749 --> @dr-dolomite commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025): NR/E/ARFCN Calculator was added to the latest beta 2.0.1. Closing this now.
Author
Owner

@hermsi94 commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025):

Very nice. The cell search with the values, displayed frequencies etc. is really great. Thank you. 👌

Many thanks for your efforts

<!-- gh-comment-id:2723740088 --> @hermsi94 commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025): Very nice. The cell search with the values, displayed frequencies etc. is really great. Thank you. 👌 Many thanks for your efforts
Author
Owner

@dr-dolomite commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025):

Really appreciate that feed back 😁

<!-- gh-comment-id:2723752698 --> @dr-dolomite commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025): Really appreciate that feed back 😁
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/quectel-rgmii-toolkit#35
No description provided.