starred/psst

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/jpochyla/psst.git synced 2026-04-27 07:25:52 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #417] Cut a release for Flatpak, etc. #267

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-28 14:31:46 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-28 14:31:46 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @jacksongoode on GitHub (May 13, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/417

In order for us to publish to Flathub #141 we need a real semantically versioned release, something that should have been tackled a while ago 😆.

My gut says we just start with 1.0.0 and increment the patch number from there? Maybe it would be good to have an action to do this automatically. @Insprill @TheEvilSkeleton @jpochyla

Originally created by @jacksongoode on GitHub (May 13, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/417 In order for us to publish to Flathub #141 we need a real semantically versioned release, something that should have been tackled a while ago 😆. My gut says we just start with `1.0.0` and increment the patch number from there? Maybe it would be good to have an action to do this automatically. @Insprill @TheEvilSkeleton @jpochyla

kerem closed this issue

2026-02-28 14:31:46 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-28 14:31:46 +03:00

Author

Owner

@TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (May 14, 2023):

I agree. Otherwise, if you think it's not production ready, then we could start with experimental releases.

@TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (May 14, 2023): I agree. Otherwise, if you think it's not production ready, then we could start with experimental releases.

kerem commented

2026-02-28 14:31:46 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Insprill commented on GitHub (May 14, 2023):

A major version > 0 indicates a stable application, which psst is not. If we switch to semantic versioning, we'll start at 0.1.0. I haven't used Flatpak before; does it not let us use a git hash for a version? If we are to switch to semantic versioning, I'd like to hear @jpochyla's thoughts.

@Insprill commented on GitHub (May 14, 2023): A major version > 0 indicates a stable application, which psst is not. If we switch to semantic versioning, we'll start at `0.1.0`. I haven't used Flatpak before; does it not let us use a git hash for a version? If we are to switch to semantic versioning, I'd like to hear @jpochyla's thoughts.

kerem commented

2026-02-28 14:31:47 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jpochyla commented on GitHub (May 15, 2023):

Personally I'd prefer 0.1.0, yes.

@jpochyla commented on GitHub (May 15, 2023): Personally I'd prefer `0.1.0`, yes.

kerem commented

2026-02-28 14:31:47 +03:00

Author

Owner

@TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (May 15, 2023):

does it not let us use a git hash for a version?

Flatpak (the format) does, but Flathub (the store) prefers semantic versioning

@TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (May 15, 2023): > does it not let us use a git hash for a version? Flatpak (the format) does, but Flathub (the store) prefers semantic versioning

kerem commented

2026-02-28 14:31:47 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jacksongoode commented on GitHub (May 15, 2023):

I'm good with 0.1.0 - I can close this issue and we can go ahead?

@jacksongoode commented on GitHub (May 15, 2023): I'm good with 0.1.0 - I can close this issue and we can go ahead?

kerem commented

2026-02-28 14:31:47 +03:00

Author

Owner

@TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (May 15, 2023):