[GH-ISSUE #16] OS Bundles #15

Closed
opened 2026-02-28 14:29:57 +03:00 by kerem · 15 comments
Owner

Originally created by @gokayokyay on GitHub (Jan 7, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/16

Hello!
First of all, thanks for the amazing project. ❤️ I really appreciate for your efforts to save us from lots of cpu usage (no offense electron's awesome too just a little heavy).
When do you plan to create OS specific bundles? Compilation of the release profile is way too slow. Takes up to an hour with a 1 gig linux instance.

Originally created by @gokayokyay on GitHub (Jan 7, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/16 Hello! First of all, thanks for the amazing project. :heart: I really appreciate for your efforts to save us from lots of cpu usage (no offense electron's awesome too just a little heavy). When do you plan to create OS specific bundles? Compilation of the release profile is way too slow. Takes up to an hour with a 1 gig linux instance.
kerem 2026-02-28 14:29:57 +03:00
Author
Owner

@jpochyla commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2021):

Hi! Thanks, that's great to hear. Platform bundles are definitely on the roadmap, once we have a CI (GitHub actions?) working.

<!-- gh-comment-id:757457133 --> @jpochyla commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2021): Hi! Thanks, that's great to hear. Platform bundles are definitely on the roadmap, once we have a CI (GitHub actions?) working.
Author
Owner

@gokayokyay commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2021):

Hmm okay then I'll fork and try some stuff with actions, but won't promise anything 😄

<!-- gh-comment-id:757513448 --> @gokayokyay commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2021): Hmm okay then I'll fork and try some stuff with actions, but won't promise anything :smile:
Author
Owner

@jpochyla commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2021):

We now have Ubuntu and Mac CI working, and the artifacts (just naked executables for now) are available at the run page.

<!-- gh-comment-id:759622800 --> @jpochyla commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2021): We now have Ubuntu and Mac CI working, and the artifacts (just naked executables for now) are available at the run page.
Author
Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2021):

I mean, I guessing seeing a DEB, AppImage, Flatpak, or maybe a Snap file would be nice.

<!-- gh-comment-id:766188528 --> @ghost commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2021): I mean, I guessing seeing a DEB, AppImage, Flatpak, or maybe a Snap file would be nice.
Author
Owner

@TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2021):

Just created a Flatpak manifest: https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/pull/141. I'm awaiting for approval so it creates a Flatpak bundle.

<!-- gh-comment-id:903881302 --> @TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2021): Just created a Flatpak manifest: https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/pull/141. I'm awaiting for approval so it creates a Flatpak bundle.
Author
Owner

@reesericci commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2021):

AppImages anyone?

<!-- gh-comment-id:909750088 --> @reesericci commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2021): AppImages anyone?
Author
Owner

@cedws commented on GitHub (Dec 23, 2021):

I want to create a Scoop manifest but the project would need to adopt Releases for this to be viable. Well, that's not entirely true, but pulling a "nightly" binary in a package is not really any good.

Any possibility of this?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1000057013 --> @cedws commented on GitHub (Dec 23, 2021): I want to create a Scoop manifest but the project would need to adopt Releases for this to be viable. Well, that's not entirely true, but pulling a "nightly" binary in a package is not really any good. Any possibility of this?
Author
Owner

@jpochyla commented on GitHub (Dec 23, 2021):

I was planning to start releasing once we reach a certain feature set, most probably including Connect support, playlist manipulation, and once we solve the audio-related problems (device switching, audio buffer underruns on high CPU). I should reify these somehow as a Milestone here.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1000115494 --> @jpochyla commented on GitHub (Dec 23, 2021): I was planning to start releasing once we reach a certain feature set, most probably including Connect support, playlist manipulation, and once we solve the audio-related problems (device switching, audio buffer underruns on high CPU). I should reify these somehow as a Milestone here.
Author
Owner

@reesericci commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2022):

Flatpak seems to be pulling away in the Linux packaging sphere. I now believe that Flatpak is the best option for Psst.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1054574288 --> @reesericci commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2022): Flatpak seems to be pulling away in the Linux packaging sphere. I now believe that Flatpak is the best option for Psst.
Author
Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2022):

Flatpak is the best bet, meaning pushing it to Flathub will be a good idea.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1054582958 --> @ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2022): Flatpak is the best bet, meaning pushing it to Flathub will be a good idea.
Author
Owner

@TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2022):

We could directly package it to Flathub. That's what OBS Studio did https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5569.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1054627775 --> @TheEvilSkeleton commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2022): We could directly package it to Flathub. That's what OBS Studio did https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5569.
Author
Owner

@SO9010 commented on GitHub (Sep 24, 2024):

@jpochyla is the still an issue as we have got the downloads section?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2369807912 --> @SO9010 commented on GitHub (Sep 24, 2024): @jpochyla is the still an issue as we have got the downloads section?
Author
Owner

@Peque commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2024):

@jacksongoode It seems that https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/170 was closed as duplicate of this issue (https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/16).

Is Psst available via Flatpak/Flathub? (I haven't been able to find it in Flathub)

<!-- gh-comment-id:2373991730 --> @Peque commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2024): @jacksongoode It seems that https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/170 was closed as duplicate of this issue (https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/16). Is Psst available via Flatpak/Flathub? (I haven't been able to find it in Flathub)
Author
Owner

@SO9010 commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2024):

@Peque it's not available yet, the reason for closing this issue is due to the fact that there is an easy downloads section. But Ill have a quick look at porting the build to flathub and then perhaps we can submit it to be in the official repository.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2374053331 --> @SO9010 commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2024): @Peque it's not available yet, the reason for closing this issue is due to the fact that there is an easy downloads section. But Ill have a quick look at porting the build to flathub and then perhaps we can submit it to be in the official repository.
Author
Owner

@Peque commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2024):

@SO9010 Thanks! I opened https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/530 to track this issue (https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/170 seemed like just mentioned Flatpak, but the one I opened suggests using Flathub as a way to distribute the package). 😊

<!-- gh-comment-id:2374072865 --> @Peque commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2024): @SO9010 Thanks! I opened https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/530 to track this issue (https://github.com/jpochyla/psst/issues/170 seemed like just mentioned Flatpak, but the one I opened suggests using Flathub as a way to distribute the package). :blush:
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/psst#15
No description provided.