[GH-ISSUE #44] Balancing not work with multiples node 9/9 #34

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-02 15:47:24 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 15:47:24 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @ThibautBascoulergue on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/PegaProx/project-pegaprox/issues/44

Hi,

I’ve just added a 9-node Proxmox cluster to PegaProx

The VM balancing mode does not seem to kick in.
Some nodes that were recently added currently have no VMs at all, yet no migration is triggered by PegaProx.
Are there any logs available that could help identify where it’s getting stuck?
Thank's

Originally created by @ThibautBascoulergue on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/PegaProx/project-pegaprox/issues/44 Hi, I’ve just added a 9-node Proxmox cluster to PegaProx <img width="829" height="764" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21681387-7ff4-43d9-804b-9f1fa4981f13" /> <img width="402" height="346" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b452a516-58cc-40a9-a535-17104f332816" /> <img width="616" height="765" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/434aee98-6489-4109-b17c-f1b5b9e8ce05" /> The VM balancing mode does not seem to kick in. Some nodes that were recently added currently have no VMs at all, yet no migration is triggered by PegaProx. Are there any logs available that could help identify where it’s getting stuck? Thank's

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-02 15:47:24 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-02 15:47:25 +03:00

Author

Owner

@mkellermann97 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026):

Hi @ThibautBascoulergue ,

please create a support bundle in the PegaProx settings and then send it to support@pegaprox.com so we can take a look at it.

Regards,
Marcus

@mkellermann97 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026): Hi @ThibautBascoulergue , please create a support bundle in the PegaProx settings and then send it to support@pegaprox.com so we can take a look at it. Regards, Marcus

kerem commented

2026-03-02 15:47:25 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ThibautBascoulergue commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026):

In the end, it worked fine. It took some time before the first migration started, but everything is OK now. Do you still want the log bundle?

@ThibautBascoulergue commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026): In the end, it worked fine. It took some time before the first migration started, but everything is OK now. Do you still want the log bundle?

kerem commented

2026-03-02 15:47:25 +03:00

Author

Owner

@mkellermann97 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026):

Hi @ThibautBascoulergue

If you want sure you can send us the logs. Our load balancing is sometimes a bit slower so we don't exhaust the Proxmox API this could be the case.

Regards,
Marcus

@mkellermann97 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026): Hi @ThibautBascoulergue If you want sure you can send us the logs. Our load balancing is sometimes a bit slower so we don't exhaust the Proxmox API this could be the case. Regards, Marcus

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-02 15:47:51 +03:00

[PR #36] [MERGED] fix: Pin Alpine release to 3.23.3 and Python to 3.12 for reproducible builds #90