[GH-ISSUE #60] [request] Other Relational Databases #48

Closed
opened 2026-02-26 21:34:11 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @Aesop7 on GitHub (Nov 23, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/eduardolat/pgbackweb/issues/60

First and foremost, thank you for developing such a great tool for PostgreSQL backups. Having experienced many headaches with Barman, the user-friendly web interface is a breath of fresh air.

Like many others I'm sure, the infrastructure i'm working in includes other databases, primarily MySQL/MariaDB. I'd see a ton of value in a unified backup solution, extending PGBackWeb's capabilities to support these databases for:

  • Centralized Backup Management: A single platform to look at for for multiple databases simplifies workflows
  • Consistent Backup Practices: Uniformity in backup procedures across different databases promotes reliability and ease of maintenance.
  • Broadened PGBackWeb's Adoption: Supporting a wider range of databases would attract a larger user base, fostering a more diverse and engaged community.

Thank you for considering this feature request. I'm looking forward to the continued evolution of PGBackWeb and are excited about the possibilities this enhancement could bring.

Originally created by @Aesop7 on GitHub (Nov 23, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/eduardolat/pgbackweb/issues/60 First and foremost, thank you for developing such a great tool for PostgreSQL backups. Having experienced many headaches with Barman, the user-friendly web interface is a breath of fresh air. Like many others I'm sure, the infrastructure i'm working in includes other databases, primarily MySQL/MariaDB. I'd see a ton of value in a unified backup solution, extending PGBackWeb's capabilities to support these databases for: - Centralized Backup Management: A single platform to look at for for multiple databases simplifies workflows - Consistent Backup Practices: Uniformity in backup procedures across different databases promotes reliability and ease of maintenance. - Broadened PGBackWeb's Adoption: Supporting a wider range of databases would attract a larger user base, fostering a more diverse and engaged community. Thank you for considering this feature request. I'm looking forward to the continued evolution of PGBackWeb and are excited about the possibilities this enhancement could bring.
kerem 2026-02-26 21:34:11 +03:00
  • closed this issue
  • added the
    duplicate
    label
Author
Owner

@eduardolat commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2024):

Hi @Aesop7 , Let's continue the conversation in #24 where more people are involved

<!-- gh-comment-id:2495788616 --> @eduardolat commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2024): Hi @Aesop7 , Let's continue the conversation in #24 where more people are involved
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/pgbackweb#48
No description provided.