[GH-ISSUE #124] Feature. Support for Hetzner S3 compatible storage (more simple and much cheaper). #105

Closed
opened 2026-02-26 21:34:27 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @paatriot1988 on GitHub (Jun 13, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/eduardolat/pgbackweb/issues/124

Hetzner serves Europe (EU) and USA. They offer S3 compatible storage against much lower prices and much less complexity.

https://www.hetzner.com/storage/object-storage/

Originally created by @paatriot1988 on GitHub (Jun 13, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/eduardolat/pgbackweb/issues/124 Hetzner serves Europe (EU) and USA. They offer S3 compatible storage against much lower prices and much less complexity. https://www.hetzner.com/storage/object-storage/
kerem closed this issue 2026-02-26 21:34:27 +03:00
Author
Owner

@eduardolat commented on GitHub (Jun 13, 2025):

Have you tried to add Hetzner bucket to PGBackWeb?? what is the error it throws?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2970883639 --> @eduardolat commented on GitHub (Jun 13, 2025): Have you tried to add Hetzner bucket to PGBackWeb?? what is the error it throws? - https://docs.hetzner.com/storage/object-storage/faq/s3-credentials - https://docs.hetzner.com/storage/object-storage/getting-started/using-s3-api-tools
Author
Owner

@paatriot1988 commented on GitHub (Jun 16, 2025):

Hi,

Yes I Tried.

Error:
Image

And

Image

<!-- gh-comment-id:2976216108 --> @paatriot1988 commented on GitHub (Jun 16, 2025): Hi, Yes I Tried. Error: <img width="486" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/870222e4-b0bc-4813-b5eb-440862afaff9" /> And ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/10999b44-4251-466f-a353-fc78a6ce780f)
Author
Owner

@paatriot1988 commented on GitHub (Jun 16, 2025):

Never mind. Sorry. It works.

I pasted url without https. That was the problem.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2976301997 --> @paatriot1988 commented on GitHub (Jun 16, 2025): Never mind. Sorry. It works. I pasted url without https. That was the problem.
Author
Owner

@eduardolat commented on GitHub (Jun 16, 2025):

don't worry and yes, the endpoint should include the protocol

<!-- gh-comment-id:2978497746 --> @eduardolat commented on GitHub (Jun 16, 2025): don't worry and yes, the endpoint should include the protocol
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/pgbackweb#105
No description provided.