mirror of
https://github.com/clechasseur/pathcopycopy.git
synced 2026-04-25 12:15:58 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #141] [FEATURE] Ability to hide "Settings..."-Command in Submenu #139
Labels
No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
enhancement
fixed
help wanted
help wanted
invalid
pull-request
question
waiting for input
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/pathcopycopy#139
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @0nelight on GitHub (Apr 14, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/clechasseur/pathcopycopy/issues/141
Originally assigned to: @clechasseur on GitHub.
I would like to be able to disable the "Settings..."-Command in the Submenu because I rarley edit the settings and therefore it would be nice to have an option to remove it from the Submenue to keep the UI clean.
In case I disable it I can navigate to the Settings.exe and change my settings there.
@blackcrack commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021):
this belongs to the extension and need to show ever, there is no possibility to unhide the settings agains.
Thing to the no-technical/non-extended Users, there want come massive troubles..
in direction "My settingsmenu is gone" "how can i recover my Settingsmenu" and so on..
bad idea... ! trust me.. i be more as 25 Years at some software ..
(was also in Bulletin Board's over Terminal Emu. over Drt. with Cardware, Shareware and some Soft)
best
Blackcrack
Blackysgate .de / .net
@0nelight commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021):
@blackcrack We can offer the option in the registry so the possibility of accidentally disable this by a non-expert user can be avoided completely.
@n0f4c3 commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021):
I agree with blackcrack it's a very bad idea and even the way you suggest to set up the option is risky because an inexperienced user might decide to go and change the value in his registry and do the wrong thing
@0nelight commented on GitHub (May 3, 2021):
@n0f4c3 Your argument of "doing the wrong thing" is exactly what a user would do if he enables an option in the Windows-Registry he doesn't intend to enable - that's true for every bit in your computer... Only the users mind can protect him of doing that - and the barrier to do an unintended change of the windows registry is very high due all to the commands which have to be executed before we can change a registry-entry. Either you have to intentially play with settings or you have to be on some kind of drugs to do this unintentionally. I personally don't get your argument, but I am open to discuss.
@n0f4c3 commented on GitHub (May 3, 2021):
@ 0nelight me this is your argument several levels of security before you can access the regist I don't understand because there is only one and it is this window :
(sorry for the French image I am Quebec Canadian)
so to come back to what I said he just has to click on yes and he can do whatever he wants even if it can be fatal for the computer so that's one of the reasons why your idea seems dangerous to me
@0nelight commented on GitHub (May 3, 2021):
What about messing with the million other registry-entries that can mess windows up? Would you touch them when you are not sure what you are doing? No you would not 😅 Additionally you need a lot of steps to change a specific registry entry when starting from the desktop. In case I don‘t answer anymore its because of the inaccuracies in your arguments - don‘t take it personal 😉
@n0f4c3 commented on GitHub (May 3, 2021):
@0nelight in the best case you are right but for a user who wants to experiment and learn he will do anything even if it can be dangerous because he does not know it
@clechasseur commented on GitHub (May 3, 2021):
There's no need to argue all that much. We already have a setting to completely hide the submenu, which also prevents the user from accessing the settings, and it hasn't caused much trouble in all these years. I believe a registry-only entry would be fine.
@n0f4c3 commented on GitHub (May 4, 2021):
@clechasseur Thank you for your answer and sorry for all that
@clechasseur commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2021):
This has been implemented in
defaultand will be part of the next release. To avoid displaying the Settings entry, add the following registry entry inHKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\clechasseur\PathCopyCopy:AlwaysShowSettingsEntry(typeDWORD, value0)@ggbbrr commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2021):
Wasn't this option already present before ?
Key = "KeyLock" ( 0 or 1 )
I know it still works.
@clechasseur commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2021):
KeyLockdoesn't really do the same thing. While it doesn't display the Settings entry, true, it also disables editing settings altogether and prevents reading from settings inHKEY_CURRENT_USERif they exist.