[GH-ISSUE #511] missing requirements #392

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-25 21:31:50 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:31:50 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @brettowe on GitHub (Jan 23, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ciur/papermerge/issues/511

Originally assigned to: @ciur on GitHub.

Description
I was looking at the issue https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-papermerge/issues/42 and trying to figure out how to fix the problem and I see that the dockerfile is needing the requirements file to cover modules needed.
looking at the requirements files in this repo I don't see PikePDF or OCRmyPDF listed.
is there any reason for them to be left out?

Originally created by @brettowe on GitHub (Jan 23, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ciur/papermerge/issues/511 Originally assigned to: @ciur on GitHub. **Description** I was looking at the issue https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-papermerge/issues/42 and trying to figure out how to fix the problem and I see that the dockerfile is needing the requirements file to cover modules needed. looking at the requirements files in this repo I don't see PikePDF or OCRmyPDF listed. is there any reason for them to be left out?

kerem

2026-02-25 21:31:50 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
docker
label

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:31:50 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ciur commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2023):

I think there is a misunderstanding here regarding 2.0 vs 2.1 versions.

Linuxserver docker image is only for Papermerge DMS 2.0.
While the above mentioned ticket: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-papermerge/issues/42
tries to use a feature which is in Papermerge DMS 2.1, at very least this link which is referenced in the linuxserver issue from above, describes a feature which does not exist in 2.0.

@ciur commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2023): I think there is a misunderstanding here regarding 2.0 vs 2.1 versions. Linuxserver docker image is only for Papermerge DMS 2.0. While the above mentioned ticket: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-papermerge/issues/42 tries to use a feature which is in Papermerge DMS 2.1, at very least [this link](https://docs.papermerge.io/User%27s%20Manual/page_management.html#move-document-to-document) which is referenced in the linuxserver issue from above, describes a feature which does not exist in 2.0.

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:31:50 +03:00

Author

Owner

@brettowe commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2023):

that would explain the problem then. I guess it's time to find a new docker image to use then.
thanks

@brettowe commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2023): that would explain the problem then. I guess it's time to find a new docker image to use then. thanks