mirror of
https://github.com/ciur/papermerge.git
synced 2026-04-25 12:05:58 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #305] Add extra conditions to automates #241
Labels
No labels
2.1
3.0
3.0.1
3.0.2
3.0.3
3.0.3
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.5
3.x
Fixed. Waiting for feedback.
Fixed. Waiting for feedback.
UX
Version 2.1 - alpha
XSS
announcement
beta
blocker
bug
cannot reproduce
confirmed
confirmed
critical
demo
dependencies
deployment
detchnical debt
discussion
docker
documentation
donations
duplicate
enhancement
feature request
frontend
fundraising
good first issue
good issue
help wanted
high
implemented
important
improvement
incomplete
invalid
investigation
kubernetes
low
low impact
medium
medium
medium impact
migration from 2.0
migration from 2.1
missing-language
missing-ocr-language
no-activity
note
ocr
outofscope
packaging
performance
popular request
pull-request
pypi
question
raspberry pi
roadmap
search
security
setup
status
task
technical debt
updates
user xp
version 1.4.0 - demo
will be implemented
will not be implemented
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/papermerge#241
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @CWempe on GitHub (Feb 13, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ciur/papermerge/issues/305
Originally assigned to: @ciur on GitHub.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to add metadata or tags to a document.
But the matching would be improved it the automate was only applied to documents with a specific tag or another criteria.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add conditions like "only for documents with these tags:" or "only for this file type:".
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
A possible use case would be to automatically add the amount of a receipt as a metadata.
I think getting the amount via RegEx would result in many false positives it it was applied to all documents.
But If you can define a specific RegEx just for Lidl receipts and another for Aldi receipts it might work.
@jhueppauff commented on GitHub (Jun 5, 2022):
Great would be also a condition like "at least x times".
Sometimes you have like 5-6 keywords but not always every keyword might be detected or present.
4 out of 6 Keywords might still be able to identify the document