[GH-ISSUE #104] Nodes Systemressources overview and monitoring #70

Open
opened 2026-02-26 17:31:14 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @julianfegert on GitHub (Jun 30, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ConvoyPanel/panel/issues/104

Is there an existing feature request for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues before opening this feature request.

Describe the feature you would like to see.

Convoy should offer a host node overview on the admin dashboard start page where the current utilization of CPU, RAM and the installed hard disks is displayed and should be able to monitor the Proxmox nodes via ping test. if the ping test fails, the administrator is informed by e-mail

Describe the solution you'd like.

Monitoring via ping test and system ressources overview of the Proxmox nodes

Additional context to this request.

No response

Originally created by @julianfegert on GitHub (Jun 30, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ConvoyPanel/panel/issues/104 ### Is there an existing feature request for this? - [X] I have searched the existing issues before opening this feature request. ### Describe the feature you would like to see. Convoy should offer a host node overview on the admin dashboard start page where the current utilization of CPU, RAM and the installed hard disks is displayed and should be able to monitor the Proxmox nodes via ping test. if the ping test fails, the administrator is informed by e-mail ### Describe the solution you'd like. Monitoring via ping test and system ressources overview of the Proxmox nodes ### Additional context to this request. _No response_
Author
Owner

@staalexa commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2024):

You should monitor your proxmox nodes seperately, there is no reason why convoy should be doing that.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2219814877 --> @staalexa commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2024): You should monitor your proxmox nodes seperately, there is no reason why convoy should be doing that.
Author
Owner

@ericwang401 commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2024):

You should monitor your proxmox nodes seperately, there is no reason why convoy should be doing that.

This is a planned feature. I'll have Convoy pull only the metrics of the node into the panel.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2220446495 --> @ericwang401 commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2024): > You should monitor your proxmox nodes seperately, there is no reason why convoy should be doing that. This is a planned feature. I'll have Convoy pull only the metrics of the node into the panel.
Author
Owner

@ericwang401 commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2024):

You should monitor your proxmox nodes seperately, there is no reason why convoy should be doing that.

This is a planned feature. I'll have Convoy pull only the metrics of the node into the panel.

A nice addition, if not already thought of, would be the ability to fetch machine usage (not cpu/ram usage, but like how many houses the machine was on, created etc). This would allow implementation of usage based billing. Also a way to send webhooks after a server was created, (possibly divided by api created or created via the web interface), would make metered billing a dream.

Houses the machine was on? What does this mean?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2267082690 --> @ericwang401 commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2024): > > > You should monitor your proxmox nodes seperately, there is no reason why convoy should be doing that. > > > > > > This is a planned feature. I'll have Convoy pull only the metrics of the node into the panel. > > A nice addition, if not already thought of, would be the ability to fetch machine usage (not cpu/ram usage, but like how many houses the machine was on, created etc). This would allow implementation of usage based billing. Also a way to send webhooks after a server was created, (possibly divided by api created or created via the web interface), would make metered billing a dream. Houses the machine was on? What does this mean?
Author
Owner

@staalexa commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2024):

I guess he means hours

<!-- gh-comment-id:2267082743 --> @staalexa commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2024): I guess he means hours
Author
Owner

@GunniBusch commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2024):

Yeah. My autocorrect on my phone was bad sorry. I corrected it

<!-- gh-comment-id:2267084440 --> @GunniBusch commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2024): Yeah. My autocorrect on my phone was bad sorry. I corrected it
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/panel#70
No description provided.