mirror of
https://github.com/ConvoyPanel/panel.git
synced 2026-04-25 04:35:52 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #17] Feature Request: Reverse DNS via..... #7
Labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/panel#7
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @CloudieLLC on GitHub (Feb 24, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ConvoyPanel/panel/issues/17
Ability to have hosted PowerDNS, PowerDNS Admin or even using Cloudflare etc
Or, inbuilt with ability to push out via AFXR or something, but.. having rDNS ability would be good :) (unless i've missed where that is)
@ericwang401 commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2023):
Hello, thank you for your feature request.
I do not have an idea of how I would implement rDNS into Convoy. Would users already have the ability to do it through their registrar or alternative providers (e.g. no-ip)? What unique benefit does this feature bring?
@CloudieLLC commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2023):
users themselves, no. since it would be tied by the provider, since it's their IP space, would then need to setup a DNS server anyway ( PowerDNS, BIND etc) , or offload it to Cloudflare, or CloudNS etc. and use API to set the reverse dns (PTR) for users.
Especially for those that are running mail servers or simular on their VMs, having proper reverse dns (PTR) is best.
eg; Without PTR: https://my.screenimg.xyz/920a748f
eg; With PTR: https://my.screenimg.xyz/e4151ec3
Which, if you were able to add in an API call function, using Cloudflare or CloudNS and say PowerDNS. (with options) then things would be able to work from that;
on how it's made in other panels;
https://docs .virt fusion.com/administration/reverse-dns@ericwang401 commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2023):
This is interesting. I will have to take another look at this at another time. I am busy with making Convoy stable and performant as it is at the moment. I hope you can understand. Thanks!
@CloudieLLC commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2023):
I more than understand, as I go through and do more testing, I might come up with some more FR's and stuff, and of course, i'm open to been told to shut up :)
@ericwang401 commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2023):
This request must be remade with the new feature request template.