mirror of
https://github.com/aluxnimm/outlookcaldavsynchronizer.git
synced 2026-04-27 03:45:59 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #183] CalDav Synchronizer Gmail Exception #646
Labels
No labels
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
Feature
Feature request
Google
Google Calendar
async
attachement
auto-migrated
auto-migrated
auto-migrated
bug
critical
enhancement
help wanted
implemented
pull-request
solved
solved
sourceforge
sourceforge
sourceforge
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/outlookcaldavsynchronizer#646
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @stlfit84 on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/aluxnimm/outlookcaldavsynchronizer/issues/183
When synchronizing my Outlook calendar with my Gmail calendar a meeting from Outlook was copied to my Gmail calendar and sent out as an invitation to other participants in the meeting with the organizer being my Gmail address. I want to ensure this does not occur again and would like to root cause what I did to cause it to occur. Any direction you're able to provide is greatly appreciated.
@aluxnimm commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016):
and who was the organizer in Outlook? and who are attendees? google doesn't honour the SCHEDULE-AGENT = CLIENT setting abd always sends new meeting invites. you can only disable mapping of organizer and attendees all together in event mapping configuration of the syncprofile to avoid it.
@stlfit84 commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016):
The organizer in Outlook was an individual in the company and invitees were
company attendees. I was an attendee in the Outlook entry. My
understanding is, by disabling the mapping, the organizer and attendees
will not populate, rather calendar entry w/ subject and description,
correct?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Alex Nimmervoll notifications@github.com
wrote:
@aluxnimm commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016):
yes everything else will be mapped.
@stlfit84 commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016):
Thank you!
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Alex Nimmervoll notifications@github.com
wrote: