[GH-ISSUE #17] Website Back Online report seem need improvement #12

Closed
opened 2026-02-27 09:12:34 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @nalakawula on GitHub (Nov 27, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maelstrom-cms/odin/issues/17

I test to monitor single site http://localdev.local, then simulate down time by shutdown those site. Odin give me a report that those site is down. Ten minutes later I start those site again, and odin send me report that those site is Online but give wrong time. Here the content:

Website Back Online: http://localdev.local.
The website had been offline for 1 second.

Report said offline for 1 second, the actual time is offline about 10 minutes.

Thank you

Originally created by @nalakawula on GitHub (Nov 27, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maelstrom-cms/odin/issues/17 I test to monitor single site http://localdev.local, then simulate down time by shutdown those site. Odin give me a report that those site is down. Ten minutes later I start those site again, and odin send me report that those site is Online but give wrong time. Here the content: ``` Website Back Online: http://localdev.local. The website had been offline for 1 second. ``` Report said offline for 1 second, the actual time is offline about 10 minutes. Thank you
kerem closed this issue 2026-02-27 09:12:34 +03:00
Author
Owner

@OwenMelbz commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2019):

Hi,

Can you check the date stamps within your database please with the uptime table.

It should store the time it checks each time then it just does a difference

<!-- gh-comment-id:558958774 --> @OwenMelbz commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2019): Hi, Can you check the date stamps within your database please with the uptime table. It should store the time it checks each time then it just does a difference
Author
Owner

@nalakawula commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2019):

website id: 1 offline at 2019-11-27 08:55:07
website id:1 online at 2019-11-27 09:06:03

That value from uptime_scans > updated_at

<!-- gh-comment-id:559010845 --> @nalakawula commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2019): website id: 1 offline at 2019-11-27 08:55:07 website id:1 online at 2019-11-27 09:06:03 That value from uptime_scans > updated_at
Author
Owner

@OwenMelbz commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2019):

Thanks :)

We’ll take a look at it when we get some time. Got a lot of projects on
currently so can’t promise it will get resolved this/next week. But it will be in our radar!

<!-- gh-comment-id:559021859 --> @OwenMelbz commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2019): Thanks :) We’ll take a look at it when we get some time. Got a lot of projects on currently so can’t promise it will get resolved this/next week. But it will be in our radar!
Author
Owner

@OwenMelbz commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2019):

@nalakawula Hi, We've released an update which might fix this :)

<!-- gh-comment-id:561210371 --> @OwenMelbz commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2019): @nalakawula Hi, We've released an update which might fix this :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/odin-maelstrom-cms#12
No description provided.