[GH-ISSUE #728] 2.7.0 not starting #618

Closed
opened 2026-02-26 06:33:41 +03:00 by kerem · 8 comments
Owner

Originally created by @rlogiacco on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/728

Checklist

  • Have you pulled and found the error with jc21/nginx-proxy-manager:latest docker image?
  • Are you sure you're not using someone else's docker image?
  • If having problems with Lets Encrypt, have you made absolutely sure your site is accessible from outside of your network?

Describe the bug
Container doesn't start reporting:

[s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0.,
[fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes...,
[fix-attrs.d] done.,
[cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts...,
[cont-init.d] done.,
[services.d] starting services,
[services.d] done.,
❯ Enabling IPV6 in hosts: /etc/nginx/conf.d,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/assets.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/block-exploits.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/force-ssl.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/ip_ranges.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/letsencrypt-acme-challenge.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/proxy.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/ssl-ciphers.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/resolvers.conf,
  ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/production.conf,
❯ Enabling IPV6 in hosts: /data/nginx,
  ❯ /data/nginx/proxy_host/2.conf,
  ❯ /data/nginx/proxy_host/1.conf,
finish: applet not found,
s6-svscanctl: fatal: unable to control /var/run/s6/services: supervisor not listening,
[cont-finish.d] executing container finish scripts...,
[cont-finish.d] done.,
[s6-finish] waiting for services.,
[s6-finish] sending all processes the TERM signal.,
[s6-finish] sending all processes the KILL signal and exiting.,
  • Unable to access on the login page, but I'm starting image tagged 2.7.0

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Change a stack happily running 2.6.2 to 2.7.0

Expected behavior
Container starting

Screenshots
Not applicable

Operating System
RedHat EL 7.9

Additional context
Deploying as a stack containing both this container image and mariadb, using NFS mounted volumes ina 3 nodes swarm

Originally created by @rlogiacco on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/728 **Checklist** - [x] Have you pulled and found the error with `jc21/nginx-proxy-manager:latest` docker image? - [x] Are you sure you're not using someone else's docker image? - [x] If having problems with Lets Encrypt, have you made absolutely sure your site is accessible from outside of your network? **Describe the bug** Container doesn't start reporting: ```[s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0., [s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0., [fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes..., [fix-attrs.d] done., [cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts..., [cont-init.d] done., [services.d] starting services, [services.d] done., ❯ Enabling IPV6 in hosts: /etc/nginx/conf.d, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/assets.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/block-exploits.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/force-ssl.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/ip_ranges.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/letsencrypt-acme-challenge.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/proxy.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/ssl-ciphers.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/include/resolvers.conf, ❯ /etc/nginx/conf.d/production.conf, ❯ Enabling IPV6 in hosts: /data/nginx, ❯ /data/nginx/proxy_host/2.conf, ❯ /data/nginx/proxy_host/1.conf, finish: applet not found, s6-svscanctl: fatal: unable to control /var/run/s6/services: supervisor not listening, [cont-finish.d] executing container finish scripts..., [cont-finish.d] done., [s6-finish] waiting for services., [s6-finish] sending all processes the TERM signal., [s6-finish] sending all processes the KILL signal and exiting., ``` - Unable to access on the login page, but I'm starting image tagged `2.7.0` **To Reproduce** Steps to reproduce the behavior: 1. Change a stack happily running `2.6.2` to `2.7.0` **Expected behavior** Container starting **Screenshots** Not applicable **Operating System** RedHat EL 7.9 **Additional context** Deploying as a stack containing both this container image and mariadb, using NFS mounted volumes ina 3 nodes swarm
kerem 2026-02-26 06:33:41 +03:00
  • closed this issue
  • added the
    bug
    label
Author
Owner

@rlogiacco commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

Switching back to 2.6.2 (nothing else changes other than the image tag) fixes the issue

<!-- gh-comment-id:729598301 --> @rlogiacco commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): Switching back to 2.6.2 (nothing else changes other than the image tag) fixes the issue
Author
Owner

@jc21 commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

Hmm yes I can definitely reproduce this problem in one of my deployments. How embarrassing...

<!-- gh-comment-id:729612340 --> @jc21 commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): Hmm yes I can definitely reproduce this problem in one of my deployments. How embarrassing...
Author
Owner

@themreza commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

Just out of curiosity, are there any build checks (e.g. unit tests, e2e tests) in place before releasing a version?

<!-- gh-comment-id:729651928 --> @themreza commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): Just out of curiosity, are there any build checks (e.g. unit tests, e2e tests) in place before releasing a version?
Author
Owner

@rlogiacco commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

Hmm yes I can definitely reproduce this problem in one of my deployments. How embarrassing...

Sorry @jc21 for doing this, but I'm blocked on 2.6.2 by #594 and #717 : will 2.7.* fix that or can you give me instructions on how to get around the issue? I'm currently looking into the source files to verify if I can get any progress on that as that's blocking for me

<!-- gh-comment-id:729655801 --> @rlogiacco commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): > Hmm yes I can definitely reproduce this problem in one of my deployments. How embarrassing... Sorry @jc21 for doing this, but I'm blocked on `2.6.2` by #594 and #717 : will `2.7.*` fix that or can you give me instructions on how to get around the issue? I'm currently looking into the source files to verify if I can get any progress on that as that's blocking for me
Author
Owner

@jc21 commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

v2.7.1 is released now to fix non-starts.

As for the custom cert issue, I'll bump it to the top of my todo list

<!-- gh-comment-id:729695008 --> @jc21 commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): v2.7.1 is released now to fix non-starts. As for the custom cert issue, I'll bump it to the top of my todo list
Author
Owner

@JSH32 commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2020):

This still happens to me. Docker stack file below.

version: "3.4"
services:
  app:
    image: 'jc21/nginx-proxy-manager:v2.7.1'
    restart: always
    ports:
      # Public HTTP Port:
      - 8081:8081
      # Public HTTPS Port:
      - 8443:8443
      # Admin Web Port:
      - 8080:8080
    environment:
      DB_SQLITE_FILE: "/data/database.sqlite"
      DISABLE_IPV6: 'true'
    volumes:
      - nginx_proxy_data:/data
      - nginx_proxy_letsencrypt:/etc/letsencrypt

volumes:
  nginx_proxy_data:
    name: nginx_proxy_data
  nginx_proxy_letsencrypt:
    name: nginx_proxy_letsencrypt

networks:
  default:
    external:
      name: main
<!-- gh-comment-id:737390955 --> @JSH32 commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2020): This still happens to me. Docker stack file below. ```yml version: "3.4" services: app: image: 'jc21/nginx-proxy-manager:v2.7.1' restart: always ports: # Public HTTP Port: - 8081:8081 # Public HTTPS Port: - 8443:8443 # Admin Web Port: - 8080:8080 environment: DB_SQLITE_FILE: "/data/database.sqlite" DISABLE_IPV6: 'true' volumes: - nginx_proxy_data:/data - nginx_proxy_letsencrypt:/etc/letsencrypt volumes: nginx_proxy_data: name: nginx_proxy_data nginx_proxy_letsencrypt: name: nginx_proxy_letsencrypt networks: default: external: name: main ```
Author
Owner

@gesirdek commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2021):

this is repeated at 2.8.1

<!-- gh-comment-id:813062265 --> @gesirdek commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2021): this is repeated at 2.8.1
Author
Owner

@julesrulez96 commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2021):

confirm it is repeated in 2.8.1

<!-- gh-comment-id:824014894 --> @julesrulez96 commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2021): confirm it is repeated in 2.8.1
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/nginx-proxy-manager-NginxProxyManager#618
No description provided.