mirror of
https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager.git
synced 2026-04-25 09:25:55 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #525] Configure redirects for a range of ports #446
Labels
No labels
awaiting feedback
bug
cannot reproduce
dns provider request
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
need more info
no certbot plugin available
product-support
pull-request
question
stale
troll
upstream issue
v2
v2
v2
v3
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/nginx-proxy-manager-NginxProxyManager#446
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @sign0 on GitHub (Jul 27, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/525
Is it possible to configure redirects (stream) for a range of ports to a host ?
For example:
... to
@jimmyeao commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2020):
I too would like to figure this out!
@Lochnair commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2020):
I'd like to see this being possible as well.
I tested a simple configuration that supports this on a standalone Nginx instance:
Which works as expected. I'm not sure how to best show this in the GUI though. AFAICS we can do one of two things, either do I like I did above and use the incoming port in the proxy_pass, or redirect multiple ports to one set port, not that I can think of a reason to do that.
The database schema would also have to be updated to allow for multiple ports.
In any case we'd need a more recent version of OpenResty since port ranges were introduced in 1.15.10, and we're on 1.15.8 AFAIK.
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2024):
Issue is now considered stale. If you want to keep it open, please comment 👍
@jimmyeao commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2024):
Any progress on this?
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):
Issue is now considered stale. If you want to keep it open, please comment 👍
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2026):
Issue was closed due to inactivity.