mirror of
https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager.git
synced 2026-04-26 09:55:51 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #357] Adding AWS S3 bucket hosting as an option #307
Labels
No labels
awaiting feedback
bug
cannot reproduce
dns provider request
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
need more info
no certbot plugin available
product-support
pull-request
question
stale
troll
upstream issue
v2
v2
v2
v3
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/nginx-proxy-manager-NginxProxyManager#307
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @dpanesso on GitHub (Apr 10, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/357
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We manage around 30 hosts on our nginx reverse proxy. About 1/3 of those are hosted on AWS S3. We need https on almost all of them and using something like Cloudfront to have SSL would be overkill.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add an option on the Proxy hosts to use S3 as a forward option. This would change the location block to use the options needed for it to work. Something like this is what we use:
The maximum length of the forward_host variable would also have to be increased as 50 is too small.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I considered using the custom location option but, the host parameter is set in the non editable section of proxy.conf
Additional context
This would be my proposal:
I have made some progress on development. I can open a PR to check out my progress. I would consider some additional validations for it to be complete.
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2024):
Issue is now considered stale. If you want to keep it open, please comment 👍
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 9, 2025):
Issue was closed due to inactivity.