mirror of
https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:35:52 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #3773] [ FEATURE REQUEST ] : categories #2485
Labels
No labels
awaiting feedback
bug
cannot reproduce
dns provider request
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
need more info
no certbot plugin available
product-support
pull-request
question
stale
troll
upstream issue
v2
v2
v2
v3
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/nginx-proxy-manager-NginxProxyManager#2485
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Tygo-van-den-Hurk on GitHub (May 24, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/3773
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I personally run a lot of services on the on machine using docker. Having this many services of even multiple domains running can cause things to look a little more chaotic then I'd like.
Describe the solution you'd like
I wish there was a sort of folder structure to put your proxy/redirection hosts into. So for example, when you click on proxy hosts, instead of getting a long list of your 50 redirection hosts, you can add categories which you can expand.
begin example
example.com (or any name of your chosing)
example.net (or any name of your chosing)
example.org (or any name of your chosing)
end example
Describe alternatives you've considered
I considered running multiple NPM containers one for each domain, so that the primary proxies to the secondary, which proxies to the resource, but this is clunky, consumes more resources. Makes me have to open more windows, log in at different things etc etc
Just not ideal when a feature request would do the trick.
I saw this issue with a similar request, which was completed, but I couldn't find a resourse online on how I could create the effect I'm looking for.
Additional context

This is an example I spun up to give a rough idea of what it'd look like:
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 26, 2024):
Issue is now considered stale. If you want to keep it open, please comment 👍
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2026):
Issue was closed due to inactivity.