[GH-ISSUE #1295] Feature Request: Servercow.de #1040

Open
opened 2026-02-26 06:35:31 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @dschense on GitHub (Aug 7, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/1295

What provider would you like to see added to NPM?

Have you checked if a certbot plugin exists?
would be cool if this could be integrated:
https://github.com/jhartlep/servercow-dns-api

Originally created by @dschense on GitHub (Aug 7, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/1295 **What provider would you like to see added to NPM?** <!-- What is this provider called? --> **Have you checked if a certbot plugin exists?** would be cool if this could be integrated: https://github.com/jhartlep/servercow-dns-api
Author
Owner

@chaptergy commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2021):

Unfortunately the DNS challenge within nginx proxy manager is only available for certbot dns plugins. Servercow does not have a plugin for this. Using the acme.sh script is a very significant deviation from certbot and would require a just as significant amount of work. It also would require support for two separate DNS challenge mechanisms instead of just one. So I don't think it is very likely to be implemented for now, unless a certbot plugin is published.

The v3 rewrite of NPM will use acme.sh instead of certbot, but it is still fairly far away.

<!-- gh-comment-id:894773671 --> @chaptergy commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2021): Unfortunately the DNS challenge within nginx proxy manager is only available for [certbot dns plugins](https://certbot.eff.org/docs/using.html#dns-plugins). Servercow does not have a plugin for this. Using the acme.sh script is a very significant deviation from certbot and would require a just as significant amount of work. It also would require support for two separate DNS challenge mechanisms instead of just one. So I don't think it is very likely to be implemented for now, unless a certbot plugin is published. The v3 rewrite of NPM will use acme.sh instead of certbot, but it is still fairly far away.
Author
Owner

@KGBist2000 commented on GitHub (Jun 21, 2022):

Hey @chaptergy,
could you confirm to integrate the acme.sh support for the V3.0 ?

i have also the same issue with servercow. Addtional benefit of acmee.sh is, that by using other targets like synolgy the acme deploy-hook can be parallel used on side to the proxy-manager.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1162269365 --> @KGBist2000 commented on GitHub (Jun 21, 2022): Hey @chaptergy, could you confirm to integrate the acme.sh support for the V3.0 ? i have also the same issue with servercow. Addtional benefit of acmee.sh is, that by using other targets like synolgy the acme deploy-hook can be parallel used on side to the proxy-manager.
Author
Owner

@dschense commented on GitHub (Jun 8, 2023):

I had opened this feature request some time ago.
It's a pity that so far no possibility has been added to use servercow with the npm.

Maybe you can try again to include servercow.
There is an official acme.sh script for the provider Servercow:

https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/blob/master/dnsapi/dns_servercow.sh

<!-- gh-comment-id:1582149845 --> @dschense commented on GitHub (Jun 8, 2023): I had opened this feature request some time ago. It's a pity that so far no possibility has been added to use servercow with the npm. Maybe you can try again to include servercow. There is an official acme.sh script for the provider Servercow: https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/blob/master/dnsapi/dns_servercow.sh
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2024):

Issue is now considered stale. If you want to keep it open, please comment 👍

<!-- gh-comment-id:1982186699 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2024): Issue is now considered stale. If you want to keep it open, please comment :+1:
Author
Owner

@phil-bot commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2025):

Hello folks,

is there anything new to report on this matter?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2613978946 --> @phil-bot commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2025): Hello folks, is there anything new to report on this matter?
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2025):

Issue is now considered stale. If you want to keep it open, please comment 👍

<!-- gh-comment-id:3203913667 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2025): Issue is now considered stale. If you want to keep it open, please comment :+1:
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/nginx-proxy-manager-NginxProxyManager#1040
No description provided.