[GH-ISSUE #1454] proxmox ve now supports an answerfile. #461

Closed
opened 2026-02-27 14:51:52 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @ITJamie on GitHub (Apr 24, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netbootxyz/netboot.xyz/issues/1454

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
proxmox ve installer menu currently only supports manual installs

Describe the solution you'd like
proxmox ve installer now supports an answerfile. it would be great if the installer was extended to support it

https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Automated_Installation#Network_Section

Originally created by @ITJamie on GitHub (Apr 24, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netbootxyz/netboot.xyz/issues/1454 **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** proxmox ve installer menu currently only supports manual installs **Describe the solution you'd like** proxmox ve installer now supports an answerfile. it would be great if the installer was extended to support it https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Automated_Installation#Network_Section
kerem 2026-02-27 14:51:52 +03:00
Author
Owner

@kaysond commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2024):

This isn't really practical with Proxmox's current implementation because you need to prepare a custom ISO that tells the installer where to find the answer file. It might be possible for the CI pipeline to be updated to make a generic one with a blind --fetch-from http. This would allow users to provide the URL via DNS or DHCP option 251, but there are complications with serving the ISO too. What Proxmox really needs is a kernel option like Debian.

You can set this all up yourself with the existing netboot, though. See https://n1.602176634e-19.pro/006-automated-proxmox-ve-installation-with-netboot.xyz/

<!-- gh-comment-id:2512429947 --> @kaysond commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2024): This isn't really practical with Proxmox's current implementation because you need to prepare a custom ISO that tells the installer where to find the answer file. It might be possible for the CI pipeline to be updated to make a generic one with a blind `--fetch-from http`. This would allow users to provide the URL via DNS or DHCP option 251, but there are complications with serving the ISO too. What Proxmox really needs is a kernel option like Debian. You can set this all up yourself with the existing netboot, though. See https://n1.602176634e-19.pro/006-automated-proxmox-ve-installation-with-netboot.xyz/
Author
Owner

@antonym commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2024):

Agreed, would be ideal to specify it like Debian but when I looked at this, they currently require it to be baked into the iso. Closing this out for now until there's a better method.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2516324588 --> @antonym commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2024): Agreed, would be ideal to specify it like Debian but when I looked at this, they currently require it to be baked into the iso. Closing this out for now until there's a better method.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/netboot.xyz#461
No description provided.