starred/netboot.xyz

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/netbootxyz/netboot.xyz.git synced 2026-04-25 15:15:56 +03:00

RHEL atomic #1631

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-01 18:34:59 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-01 18:34:59 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @fabaff on GitHub (Dec 13, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netbootxyz/netboot.xyz/issues/204

Atomic Host provides an immutable infrastructure to deploy containerized applications.

The installation process is very similar to the existing ones (Fedora/CentOS/RHEL) but they have a different release cycle.

Should "X atomic" be a part of X aka as a product or flavor?

Originally created by @fabaff on GitHub (Dec 13, 2017). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netbootxyz/netboot.xyz/issues/204 [Atomic Host](http://www.projectatomic.io/) provides an immutable infrastructure to deploy containerized applications. The installation process is very similar to the existing ones (Fedora/CentOS/RHEL) but they have a different release cycle. Should "X atomic" be a part of X aka as a product or flavor?

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-01 18:35:00 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-01 18:35:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@antonym commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2017):

I haven't seen much discussion/documentation about the PXE images for Atomic, but it appears that some do exist now whereas previously a lot of Atomic was in flux:

http://mirrors.rit.edu/fedora/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-Atomic-27-20171211.0/Atomic/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/

It could be worth trying it. Is Fedora the only flavor of Atomic currently? I see some ISOs for CentOS but it doesn't look like they have any PXE images.

@antonym commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2017): I haven't seen much discussion/documentation about the PXE images for Atomic, but it appears that some do exist now whereas previously a lot of Atomic was in flux: http://mirrors.rit.edu/fedora/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-Atomic-27-20171211.0/Atomic/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/ It could be worth trying it. Is Fedora the only flavor of Atomic currently? I see some ISOs for CentOS but it doesn't look like they have any PXE images.

kerem commented

2026-03-01 18:35:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@fabaff commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2017):

I guess that it's only a matter of time till CentOS is shipping more than the ISOs.

What way do you prefer for the menu?

Simple (which is my favorite)

Fedora Atomic
  - Host
  - Workstation

Grouping all atomic installation.

Atomic
  - Fedora
  - CentOS
  - etc.

With the next one, I assume that we will run into a more complicated setup than needed as the path will probably not match.

Fedora
  - Workstation
  - Server
  - ...
  - Atomic
``

@fabaff commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2017): I guess that it's only a matter of time till CentOS is shipping more than the ISOs. What way do you prefer for the menu? Simple (which is my favorite) ```text Fedora Atomic - Host - Workstation ``` Grouping all atomic installation. ```text Atomic - Fedora - CentOS - etc. ``` With the next one, I assume that we will run into a more complicated setup than needed as the path will probably not match. ```text Fedora - Workstation - Server - ... - Atomic ``

kerem commented

2026-03-01 18:35:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@antonym commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2017):

I guess it depends on where the project is going. Because it's another version of either CentOS/Fedora/RHEL, it probably belongs under those sections. There doesn't seem to be a ton of differences at this point, at least for Fedora.

I put up a PR (https://github.com/antonym/netboot.xyz/pull/212) for Fedora's version that seems to load things up and it's pretty minimal lines of code to add. The code would probably be even more simplified if the versions didn't have unpredictable date codes or if they resided under fedora instead of fedora-alt.

@antonym commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2017): I guess it depends on where the project is going. Because it's another version of either CentOS/Fedora/RHEL, it probably belongs under those sections. There doesn't seem to be a ton of differences at this point, at least for Fedora. I put up a PR (https://github.com/antonym/netboot.xyz/pull/212) for Fedora's version that seems to load things up and it's pretty minimal lines of code to add. The code would probably be even more simplified if the versions didn't have unpredictable date codes or if they resided under fedora instead of fedora-alt.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-01 18:38:25 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #1631] System Rescue CD (UEFI) doesn't finish booting due to wrong download link #2089

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/netboot.xyz#1631

No description provided.

Rows
Columns