[GH-ISSUE #354] Real fan behaviour doesn't follow Fan/temperature config. Asus UX310UA #317

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-26 00:32:19 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-26 00:32:19 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @orianhc06 on GitHub (Oct 4, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hirschmann/nbfc/issues/354

Thanks for creating this!
I have tried it on my UX310UA (with the original config file), where the fan is supposed to work at 28% above 45c, but even at 47-48c the fan is still at 0%.
Any tips on how to solve this?

Originally created by @orianhc06 on GitHub (Oct 4, 2017). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hirschmann/nbfc/issues/354 Thanks for creating this! I have tried it on my UX310UA (with the original config file), where the fan is supposed to work at 28% above 45c, but even at 47-48c the fan is still at 0%. Any tips on how to solve this?

kerem

2026-02-26 00:32:19 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
Stale
label

kerem commented

2026-02-26 00:32:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@moklys commented on GitHub (Oct 4, 2017):

I use the UX510UX laptop and I chose the Asus Zenbuk UX51VZA configuration.

@moklys commented on GitHub (Oct 4, 2017): I use the UX510UX laptop and I chose the Asus Zenbuk UX51VZA configuration.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 00:32:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@hirschmann commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2017):

@orianhc06
According to the UX310UA, the fan will start at 60C, not at 45C.
See https://github.com/hirschmann/nbfc/wiki/Temperature-threshold#example

@hirschmann commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2017): @orianhc06 According to the UX310UA, the fan will start at 60C, not at 45C. See https://github.com/hirschmann/nbfc/wiki/Temperature-threshold#example

kerem commented

2026-02-26 00:32:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 8, 2019):

This issue is stale because it has been open more than 180 days with no activity. If nobody comments within 7 days, this issue will be closed

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 8, 2019): This issue is stale because it has been open more than 180 days with no activity. If nobody comments within 7 days, this issue will be closed