mirror of
https://github.com/modoboa/modoboa.git
synced 2026-04-27 01:45:58 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #466] Catchall does not work for domain-alias #450
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
dependencies
design
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
enhancement
feedback-needed
help-needed
help-needed
installer
invalid
looking-for-sponsors
modoboa-contacts
new-ui
new-ui
pr
pull-request
pyconfr
python
question
security
stale
webmail
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/modoboa-modoboa#450
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @tonioo on GitHub (Dec 4, 2013).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/modoboa/modoboa/issues/466
Originally assigned to: @tonioo on GitHub.
Originally created by C B on 2013-10-10T10:29:19Z
In my postfix-dovecot setup with modoboa 1.0.1 is a domain example.com with an alias of example.alias configurated. The postfix accepts mail for the configured alias username@example.{com,alias} -> external@domain.tld, and the catchall configured for example.com does work as expected. Contrary to the expectation the catchall does not work for the domain-alias example.alias.
A catchall for the domain-alias example.alias cannot be configured in the webinterface, as the domain is unknown.
@tonioo commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2013):
Posted by Antoine Nguyen on 2013-10-10T19:51:54Z
Indeed, it is not currently possible to define a catchall for a domain alias. The problem comes from the SQL query used into sql-catchall-aliases.cf.
I'll try to find one that allows this use case. If you really need such catchall, I suggest you create a domain that corresponds to you domain alias and then create a catchall for this domain.
@fompi commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2015):
A workaround is not a solution. In the meantime, I've used this query to solve this problem:
But I assume it should be worked on. Why won't create views to clarify the map files?
@tonioo commented on GitHub (Feb 17, 2015):
Yes, it could be useful. But I must admit my knowledge about views is pretty limited. Do you have any example ?