[GH-ISSUE #386] when the browser window width is smaller than 980 px, the upper menu disappears. #371

Closed
opened 2026-02-27 11:11:26 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @tonioo on GitHub (Dec 4, 2013).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/modoboa/modoboa/issues/386

Originally assigned to: @tonioo on GitHub.

Originally created by Fabrice Flore-Thébault on 2013-04-16T07:33:08Z

On version 0.9.5, when the browser window width is smaller than 980 px, the upper menu disappears.

It shouldn't happen.

One should expect that the menu stays. Maybe it could be arranged for smaller screens.

Originally created by @tonioo on GitHub (Dec 4, 2013). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/modoboa/modoboa/issues/386 Originally assigned to: @tonioo on GitHub. **Originally created by Fabrice Flore-Thébault on 2013-04-16T07:33:08Z** On version 0.9.5, when the browser window width is smaller than 980 px, the upper menu disappears. It shouldn't happen. One should expect that the menu stays. Maybe it could be arranged for smaller screens.
kerem 2026-02-27 11:11:26 +03:00
  • closed this issue
  • added the
    bug
    label
Author
Owner

@tonioo commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2013):

Posted by Fabrice Flore-Thébault on 2013-06-25T14:15:51Z

menus are using @.nav-collapse@ css class ; these entries are hidden on windows width smaller than 980 px.

see: http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/scaffolding.html#responsive

<!-- gh-comment-id:29816221 --> @tonioo commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2013): **Posted by Fabrice Flore-Thébault on 2013-06-25T14:15:51Z** menus are using @.nav-collapse@ css class ; these entries are hidden on windows width smaller than 980 px. see: http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/scaffolding.html#responsive
Author
Owner

@tonioo commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2013):

Posted by Antoine Nguyen on 2013-06-25T20:28:11Z

I made a few fixes about this but some parts (ex: webmail) still behave badly :p

It will need deeper modifications.

<!-- gh-comment-id:29816223 --> @tonioo commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2013): **Posted by Antoine Nguyen on 2013-06-25T20:28:11Z** I made a few fixes about this but some parts (ex: webmail) still behave badly :p It will need deeper modifications.
Author
Owner

@mkoistinen commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2013):

I'd like to suggest that the design should fit properly within 960px. Not so much because its a popular grid width (although, this makes the layout easier), but because of the prevalence of HD displays, which are 1920px wide, or precisely 2 X 960. This allows Modoboa admins to have two browser windows at the same time, which is very practical.

<!-- gh-comment-id:29971767 --> @mkoistinen commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2013): I'd like to suggest that the design should fit properly within 960px. Not so much because its a popular grid width (although, this makes the layout easier), but because of the prevalence of HD displays, which are 1920px wide, or precisely 2 X 960. This allows Modoboa admins to have two browser windows at the same time, which is very practical.
Author
Owner

@patrickbenkoetter commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2013):

I second Martins suggestion.

<!-- gh-comment-id:29971841 --> @patrickbenkoetter commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2013): I second Martins suggestion.
Author
Owner

@tonioo commented on GitHub (Nov 28, 2014):

Fixed by #585 (hope so...)

<!-- gh-comment-id:64896053 --> @tonioo commented on GitHub (Nov 28, 2014): Fixed by #585 (hope so...)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/modoboa-modoboa#371
No description provided.