[GH-ISSUE #1278] Feature Request: one LDAP connection per domain #1033

Closed
opened 2026-02-27 11:14:51 +03:00 by kerem · 8 comments
Owner

Originally created by @jpellissari on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/modoboa/modoboa/issues/1278

Hello all,

The company I work for would like to use modoboa as our unique email server. We manage multiple email servers and we're really looking forward to migrate to modoboa. This would allow us to manage only one email server with multiple domains. The only thing that we need to make this migration is the ability to authenticate in one LDAP per domain. I saw this post on google groups of 2011 and that's what we need! Do you think that's possible? Maybe we could help implementing this feature!

Originally created by @jpellissari on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/modoboa/modoboa/issues/1278 Hello all, The company I work for would like to use modoboa as our unique email server. We manage multiple email servers and we're really looking forward to migrate to modoboa. This would allow us to manage only one email server with multiple domains. The only thing that we need to make this migration is the ability to authenticate in one LDAP per domain. I saw [this post on google groups](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/modoboa-users/r1pArdwbNps) of 2011 and that's what we need! Do you think that's possible? Maybe we could help implementing this feature!
kerem 2026-02-27 11:14:51 +03:00
Author
Owner

@tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017):

@jpellissari To make sure I understand you well, you'd like to have a per-domain LDAP configuration in addition to the global one? For example: domain A would use LDAP directory X and domain B would use LDAP directory Y, right?

<!-- gh-comment-id:337653226 --> @tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017): @jpellissari To make sure I understand you well, you'd like to have a per-domain LDAP configuration in addition to the global one? For example: domain A would use LDAP directory X and domain B would use LDAP directory Y, right?
Author
Owner

@jpellissari commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017):

Yes! Exactly!!!

<!-- gh-comment-id:337735661 --> @jpellissari commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017): Yes! Exactly!!!
Author
Owner

@hadifarnoud commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017):

that would be nice but I think you need to sponsor this feature. not many need it

<!-- gh-comment-id:337885989 --> @hadifarnoud commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017): that would be nice but I think you need to sponsor this feature. not many need it
Author
Owner

@tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017):

@jpellissari Indeed this is an interesting feature but really adapted to a professional context. Do you think your company could sponsor (even partially) this feature?

<!-- gh-comment-id:337890191 --> @tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017): @jpellissari Indeed this is an interesting feature but really adapted to a professional context. Do you think your company could sponsor (even partially) this feature?
Author
Owner

@tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2017):

@jpellissari ping

<!-- gh-comment-id:340041460 --> @tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2017): @jpellissari ping
Author
Owner

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2020):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

<!-- gh-comment-id:715534943 --> @stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2020): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Author
Owner

@hadifarnoud commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2020):

I don't think this bot is useful.

<!-- gh-comment-id:720060008 --> @hadifarnoud commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2020): I don't think this bot is useful.
Author
Owner

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2021):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

<!-- gh-comment-id:758069291 --> @stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2021): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/modoboa-modoboa#1033
No description provided.