mirror of
https://github.com/modoboa/modoboa.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:06:01 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1278] Feature Request: one LDAP connection per domain #1033
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
dependencies
design
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
enhancement
feedback-needed
help-needed
help-needed
installer
invalid
looking-for-sponsors
modoboa-contacts
new-ui
new-ui
pr
pull-request
pyconfr
python
question
security
stale
webmail
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/modoboa-modoboa#1033
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @jpellissari on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/modoboa/modoboa/issues/1278
Hello all,
The company I work for would like to use modoboa as our unique email server. We manage multiple email servers and we're really looking forward to migrate to modoboa. This would allow us to manage only one email server with multiple domains. The only thing that we need to make this migration is the ability to authenticate in one LDAP per domain. I saw this post on google groups of 2011 and that's what we need! Do you think that's possible? Maybe we could help implementing this feature!
@tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017):
@jpellissari To make sure I understand you well, you'd like to have a per-domain LDAP configuration in addition to the global one? For example: domain A would use LDAP directory X and domain B would use LDAP directory Y, right?
@jpellissari commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2017):
Yes! Exactly!!!
@hadifarnoud commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017):
that would be nice but I think you need to sponsor this feature. not many need it
@tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017):
@jpellissari Indeed this is an interesting feature but really adapted to a professional context. Do you think your company could sponsor (even partially) this feature?
@tonioo commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2017):
@jpellissari ping
@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2020):
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
@hadifarnoud commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2020):
I don't think this bot is useful.
@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2021):
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.