[PR #648] Add Linux package links for mkcert from repology.org #525

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-25 22:33:46 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-25 22:33:46 +03:00

Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert/pull/648
Author: @meeuw
Created: 9/28/2025
Status: 🔄 Open

Base: master ← Head: linux-packages

📝 Commits (1)

0bd7993 Add Linux package links for mkcert from repology.org

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+26 additions, -6 deletions)

View changed files

📝 README.md (+26 -6)

📄 Description

There was only a reference to Arch Linux in README.md although many other Linux distributions have a "official" package for mkcert.

I took this list from repology.org: https://repology.org/project/mkcert/versions

For some distributions I couldn't find a generic package link so then I linked to the latest version of that distribution.

These links require maintenance, currently they are working but I'm some will break in the coming years.

Maybe README.md should just link to repology.org?

I don't think it's fair to only have a link to Arch Linux.

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert/pull/648 **Author:** [@meeuw](https://github.com/meeuw) **Created:** 9/28/2025 **Status:** 🔄 Open **Base:** `master` ← **Head:** `linux-packages` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`0bd7993`](https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert/commit/0bd79933b0e37510049ba289e72b2cd7a165d2d5) Add Linux package links for mkcert from repology.org ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+26 additions, -6 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `README.md` (+26 -6) </details> ### 📄 Description There was only a reference to Arch Linux in README.md although many other Linux distributions have a "official" package for mkcert. I took this list from repology.org: https://repology.org/project/mkcert/versions For some distributions I couldn't find a generic package link so then I linked to the latest version of that distribution. These links require maintenance, currently they are working but I'm some will break in the coming years. Maybe README.md should just link to repology.org? I don't think it's fair to only have a link to Arch Linux. --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>