[GH-ISSUE #541] MSBuild-integrated Markdown linting for .NET projects #444

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 01:26:58 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:26:58 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Piedone on GitHub (Jul 29, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/issues/541

(I'd have opened a Discussions thread for this if that feature would be enabled. Sorry if this is not a good place for such show and tell announcements.)

Something curious you might like: In our Lombiq Node.js Extensions project we've added Markdown linting, utilizing markdownlint too, in a way that it automatically runs as part of an MSBuild build process. This means that for .NET projects, lining for Markdown files happens automatically, as part of the normal build, and you get linter errors as build errors. This is how .NET static code analysis works as well, so this way, Markdown linting fits seamlessly into the .NET developer experience. See docs here.

What do you think?

Originally created by @Piedone on GitHub (Jul 29, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/issues/541 (I'd have opened a Discussions thread for this if that feature would be enabled. Sorry if this is not a good place for such show and tell announcements.) Something curious you might like: In our [Lombiq Node.js Extensions project](https://github.com/Lombiq/NodeJs-Extensions) we've added Markdown linting, utilizing markdownlint too, in a way that it automatically runs as part of an MSBuild build process. This means that for .NET projects, lining for Markdown files happens automatically, as part of the normal build, and you get linter errors as build errors. This is how .NET static code analysis works as well, so this way, Markdown linting fits seamlessly into the .NET developer experience. See [docs here](https://github.com/Lombiq/NodeJs-Extensions/blob/dev/Lombiq.NodeJs.Extensions/Docs/Markdown.md). What do you think?

kerem

2026-03-03 01:26:58 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement

fixed in next
labels

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:26:59 +03:00

Author

Owner

@DavidAnson commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2022):

This sounds awesome! If you want to send a PR to add a link to the "Related "section of the README, that may help spread the word. (Please have a look at CONTRIBUTING.md before doing so.)

@DavidAnson commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2022): This sounds awesome! If you want to send a PR to add a link to the "Related "section of the README, that may help spread the word. (Please have a look at CONTRIBUTING.md before doing so.)

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:26:59 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Piedone commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2022):

Great idea, thanks, will do that.

@Piedone commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2022): Great idea, thanks, will do that.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-07 20:05:38 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #444] Raise of rule MD037 in correct situation #2215