[GH-ISSUE #148] add section to you description page #59

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 08:15:00 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:15:00 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Abraka on GitHub (Apr 26, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/lldap/lldap/issues/148

Suggestion:
You should add section to you description page(somewhere on top) here, named "LLDP is compatible with following apps":

Airsonic
iDrac
Emby
... with link to specific configuration, if there si something special to configure. You already have that in some way, but this need to be much more on eyes for users.

Second...is LLDP compatible with SOGO and onlyoffice?

Originally created by @Abraka on GitHub (Apr 26, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/lldap/lldap/issues/148 Suggestion: You should add section to you description page(somewhere on top) here, named "LLDP is compatible with following apps": - Airsonic - iDrac - Emby ... with link to specific configuration, if there si something special to configure. You already have that in some way, but this need to be much more on eyes for users. Second...is LLDP compatible with SOGO and onlyoffice?

kerem closed this issue

2026-02-27 08:15:01 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:15:02 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Cyrix126 commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2022):

lldap is a server side implementation of the ldap protocol. In theory all apps which support ldap is compatible with lldap, except if they need a specification not covered by lldap.
Maybe a list of currently covered specifications could be nice to have.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4510
For example, this library in go list the covered specifications in the readme.
https://github.com/go-ldap/ldap

@Cyrix126 commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2022): lldap is a server side implementation of the ldap protocol. In theory all apps which support ldap is compatible with lldap, except if they need a specification not covered by lldap. Maybe a list of currently covered specifications could be nice to have. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4510 For example, this library in go list the covered specifications in the readme. https://github.com/go-ldap/ldap

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:15:02 +03:00

Author

Owner

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2022):

I'm not sure I implement any of these completely: the basic specification,
for instance, has support for modify operations, which is not supported in
LLDAP, we only have read-only (except for passwords).
But most apps that need to read from LDAP as an authentication provider
should work, and you can file a bug if they don't!

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, 18:20 Cyrix126, @.***> wrote:

lldap is a server side implementation of the ldap protocol. In theory all
apps which support ldap is compatible with lldap, except if they need a
specification not covered by lldap.
Maybe a list of currently covered specifications could be nice to have.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4510
For example, this library in go list the covered specifications in the
readme.
https://github.com/go-ldap/ldap

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/nitnelave/lldap/issues/148#issuecomment-1111199657,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGCPWNPCJISB5DBY7TR77LVHFSL3ANCNFSM5UMMKD7A
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: @.***>

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2022): I'm not sure I implement any of these completely: the basic specification, for instance, has support for modify operations, which is not supported in LLDAP, we only have read-only (except for passwords). But most apps that need to read from LDAP as an authentication provider should work, and you can file a bug if they don't! On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, 18:20 Cyrix126, ***@***.***> wrote: > lldap is a server side implementation of the ldap protocol. In theory all > apps which support ldap is compatible with lldap, except if they need a > specification not covered by lldap. > Maybe a list of currently covered specifications could be nice to have. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4510 > For example, this library in go list the covered specifications in the > readme. > https://github.com/go-ldap/ldap > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/nitnelave/lldap/issues/148#issuecomment-1111199657>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGCPWNPCJISB5DBY7TR77LVHFSL3ANCNFSM5UMMKD7A> > . > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message > ID: ***@***.***> >

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:15:02 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Abraka commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2022):

Well, anyway..I still thing, that the list would be greatly helpfull for users, so they know if lldap is something they can use.

@Abraka commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2022): Well, anyway..I still thing, that the list would be greatly helpfull for users, so they know if lldap is something they can use.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:15:02 +03:00

Author

Owner

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Apr 29, 2022):

I added a section about which services are compatible or not to the README. In short: they should all be compatible. Most likely they're not all compatible (e.g. Nextcloud still has some issues) but in this case that's a bug that I'm willing to work on. However, I haven't (and can't) tested everything, so it's up to you to give it a try and see if there's an issue. Feel free to contribute any configuration that you made work, to save other people some troubles!

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Apr 29, 2022): I added a section about which services are compatible or not to the README. In short: they _should_ all be compatible. Most likely they're not _all_ compatible (e.g. Nextcloud still has some issues) but in this case that's a bug that I'm willing to work on. However, I haven't (and can't) tested everything, so it's up to you to give it a try and see if there's an issue. Feel free to contribute any configuration that you made work, to save other people some troubles!