starred/lldap-lldap

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/lldap/lldap.git synced 2026-04-25 08:15:52 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #79] MultiArch ARM64 Support #33

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 08:14:47 +03:00 by kerem · 11 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:47 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @xavier83 on GitHub (Nov 17, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/lldap/lldap/issues/79

Would be great if the container images support MultiArch/ARM64 for running on arm64 embedded hardware like raspberry pi or arm64 based cloud instances.

Originally created by @xavier83 on GitHub (Nov 17, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/lldap/lldap/issues/79 Would be great if the container images support MultiArch/ARM64 for running on arm64 embedded hardware like raspberry pi or arm64 based cloud instances.

kerem

2026-02-27 08:14:47 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement

help wanted
labels

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2021):

Damn, I'm working on it but it's surprisingly difficult! Right now I'm hitting issues with musl versions for the time library (undefined reference to __time64 & co). Something along these lines, maybe? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61934997/undefined-reference-to-stat-time64-when-cross-compiling-rust-project-on-mu

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2021): Damn, I'm working on it but it's surprisingly difficult! Right now I'm hitting issues with musl versions for the time library (undefined reference to `__time64` & co). Something along these lines, maybe? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61934997/undefined-reference-to-stat-time64-when-cross-compiling-rust-project-on-mu

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Nov 19, 2021):

@xavier83 Would you be okay with a non-dockerized version? Basically just the binary + compiled WASM, drop it anywhere and run it from there. That seems to be much easier to do than a docker image (although I guess you could also have a docker-in-docker to get cross to compile it?).

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Nov 19, 2021): @xavier83 Would you be okay with a non-dockerized version? Basically just the binary + compiled WASM, drop it anywhere and run it from there. That seems to be much easier to do than a docker image (although I guess you could also have a docker-in-docker to get `cross` to compile it?).

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2021):

I'll see whether I do pre-compiled binary releases, but I'll anyway add instructions for cross-compiling to the README

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2021): I'll see whether I do pre-compiled binary releases, but I'll anyway add instructions for cross-compiling to the README

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2021):

Here are the cross-compile instructions, on the "mail" branch: https://github.com/nitnelave/lldap/tree/mail

They'll get merged into main when I merge the branch, and I'll probably do a release at that point with some precompiled binaries.

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2021): Here are the cross-compile instructions, on the "mail" branch: https://github.com/nitnelave/lldap/tree/mail They'll get merged into main when I merge the branch, and I'll probably do a release at that point with some precompiled binaries.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

@martadinata666 commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2022):

Sorry for bumping this as i interested in this, are we must going to musl ? i mean building via glibc prove to be faster and easier, yes it lost the portability thing because musl build is static, but i think it doesn't really worth to pursue.

@martadinata666 commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2022): Sorry for bumping this as i interested in this, are we must going to musl ? i mean building via glibc prove to be faster and easier, yes it lost the `portability` thing because musl build is `static`, but i think it doesn't really worth to pursue.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2022):

So, with each release I provide a pre-compiled ARM binary that you can download. I don't provide a docker image because I couldn't figure out how to cross-compile inside docker, but I put instructions in the README on how to cross-compile it yourself, it's fairly straightforward.

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2022): So, with each release I provide a pre-compiled ARM binary that you can download. I don't provide a docker image because I couldn't figure out how to cross-compile inside docker, but I put instructions in the README on how to cross-compile it yourself, it's fairly straightforward.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

@martadinata666 commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2022):

I see, let me put a PR about this build then we can talk there. 👍🏼

@martadinata666 commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2022): I see, let me put a PR about this build then we can talk there. 👍🏼

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

@yamsu commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2022):

Unable to run the docker image on an Arm64 ubuntu 20.04 host. Using the example docker-compose.yml. I get the following error:

> docker-compose up
[+] Running 1/1
 ⠿ Container lldap-lldap-1  Recreated                                                      0.1s
Attaching to lldap-lldap-1
lldap-lldap-1  | exec /app/docker-entrypoint.sh: exec format error
lldap-lldap-1 exited with code 1

The same config, on an x86 ubuntu 20.04 host, works without trouble.

@yamsu commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2022): Unable to run the docker image on an Arm64 ubuntu 20.04 host. Using the example docker-compose.yml. I get the following error: ``` > docker-compose up [+] Running 1/1 ⠿ Container lldap-lldap-1 Recreated 0.1s Attaching to lldap-lldap-1 lldap-lldap-1 | exec /app/docker-entrypoint.sh: exec format error lldap-lldap-1 exited with code 1 ``` The same config, on an x86 ubuntu 20.04 host, works without trouble.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

@martadinata666 commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2022):

Currently only :latest tag support arm64 and armv7, as this is still testing purpose, please open issue or join discord if the lldap got issues.

@martadinata666 commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2022): Currently only `:latest` tag support arm64 and armv7, as this is still testing purpose, please open issue or join discord if the lldap got issues.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:50 +03:00

Author

Owner

@yamsu commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2022):

Currently only :latest tag support arm64 and armv7, as this is still testing purpose, please open issue or join discord if the lldap got issues.

nitnelave/lldap:latest works on arm64, Thanks
updated docker-compose.yml accordingly

@yamsu commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2022): > Currently only `:latest` tag support arm64 and armv7, as this is still testing purpose, please open issue or join discord if the lldap got issues. `nitnelave/lldap:latest` works on arm64, Thanks updated docker-compose.yml accordingly

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:14:50 +03:00

Author

Owner

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2022):

You can even use :stable now, there was a release!

@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2022): You can even use `:stable` now, there was a release!

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-27 08:17:47 +03:00

[PR #33] [MERGED] User interface #504