mirror of
https://github.com/lldap/lldap.git
synced 2026-04-25 16:25:55 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #575] Customize (audit) logging for login events #208
Labels
No labels
backend
blocked
bug
cleanup
dependencies
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
frontend
github_actions
good first issue
help wanted
help wanted
integration
invalid
ldap
pull-request
question
rust
rust
tests
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/lldap-lldap#208
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Phype on GitHub (May 11, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/lldap/lldap/issues/575
Would it be possible to add support for logging login-events (from both LDAP and HTTP interfaces) for log-review, ie. as a centralized source of security events from multiple connected applications?
For HTTP this is pretty straight-forward and for LDAP, one could just log LDAP BIND operations, which are equivalent with someone attempting to log in at a connected application.
I could potentially create a PR which just logs these events to stdout, but i'm unsure whether this would integrate with https://github.com/lldap/lldap/issues/17 and it should probably be configurable too.
@nitnelave commented on GitHub (May 12, 2023):
Hmm, assuming that the HTTP login events had the username (the LDAP ones already do), could you do with the existing log? I think with some grep it should be possible to extract the login events from the logs.
This is not a use case that is high in my priority list, I'm not sure I want to complexify the software to support it.
@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2024):
I'm going to close this as out-of-scope but implementable as a plugin once we have #714 (in the distant future).
@kar0t commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2025):
Hi, ALL. We need customizable logging system for meet enterprise-level security constraint.
Should I solve #714 first?
@nitnelave commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2025):
#714 should indeed provide what you need. It's being actively worked on, there should be significant development in the next few weeks.