[GH-ISSUE #60] Added link to the Shannon reference implementation #50

Closed
opened 2026-02-27 19:28:32 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @sashahilton00 on GitHub (Jan 29, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/librespot-org/librespot/issues/60

Issue by sashahilton00
Sunday Jun 11, 2017 at 23:52 GMT
Originally opened as https://github.com/plietar/librespot/pull/197


Stumbled across the Qualcomm Shannon Cipher reference implementation whilst rewriting the authentication part of librespot, added a link to a copy of it in my repo.


sashahilton00 included the following code: https://github.com/plietar/librespot/pull/197/commits

Originally created by @sashahilton00 on GitHub (Jan 29, 2018). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/librespot-org/librespot/issues/60 <a href="https://github.com/sashahilton00"><img src="https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/4185362?v=4" align="left" width="96" height="96" hspace="10"></img></a> **Issue by [sashahilton00](https://github.com/sashahilton00)** _Sunday Jun 11, 2017 at 23:52 GMT_ _Originally opened as https://github.com/plietar/librespot/pull/197_ ---- Stumbled across the Qualcomm Shannon Cipher reference implementation whilst rewriting the authentication part of librespot, added a link to a copy of it in my repo. ---- _**[sashahilton00](https://github.com/sashahilton00)** included the following code: https://github.com/plietar/librespot/pull/197/commits_
kerem 2026-02-27 19:28:32 +03:00
Author
Owner

@sashahilton00 commented on GitHub (Jan 29, 2018):

Comment by plietar
Thursday Jun 29, 2017 at 14:59 GMT


What's the original source for this ? I'd rather point to that instead

<!-- gh-comment-id:361263400 --> @sashahilton00 commented on GitHub (Jan 29, 2018): <a href="https://github.com/plietar"><img src="https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/1489775?v=4" align="left" width="48" height="48" hspace="10"></img></a> **Comment by [plietar](https://github.com/plietar)** _Thursday Jun 29, 2017 at 14:59 GMT_ ---- What's the original source for this ? I'd rather point to that instead
Author
Owner

@sashahilton00 commented on GitHub (Jan 29, 2018):

Comment by sashahilton00
Thursday Jun 29, 2017 at 18:43 GMT


So would I, but it was pulled from web.archive.org, which isn't the greatest place to rely on for long term hosting... https://web.archive.org/web/20081010141647/http://www.qualcomm.com.au/PublicationsDocs/Shannon-1.0.tgz the original url is http://www.qualcomm.com.au/PublicationsDocs/Shannon-1.0.tgz though it's long gone.

<!-- gh-comment-id:361263429 --> @sashahilton00 commented on GitHub (Jan 29, 2018): <a href="https://github.com/sashahilton00"><img src="https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/4185362?v=4" align="left" width="48" height="48" hspace="10"></img></a> **Comment by [sashahilton00](https://github.com/sashahilton00)** _Thursday Jun 29, 2017 at 18:43 GMT_ ---- So would I, but it was pulled from web.archive.org, which isn't the greatest place to rely on for long term hosting... https://web.archive.org/web/20081010141647/http://www.qualcomm.com.au/PublicationsDocs/Shannon-1.0.tgz the original url is http://www.qualcomm.com.au/PublicationsDocs/Shannon-1.0.tgz though it's long gone.
Author
Owner

@ComlOnline commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2018):

Now found here: https://github.com/librespot-org/spotify-connect-resources/tree/master/Shannon-1.0

I think this should still be added to the documentation. But in addition should the documentation be moved to the wiki? And should it be instead part of spotify-connect-resources's wiki?

<!-- gh-comment-id:362050726 --> @ComlOnline commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2018): Now found here: https://github.com/librespot-org/spotify-connect-resources/tree/master/Shannon-1.0 I think this should still be added to the documentation. But in addition should the documentation be moved to the wiki? And should it be instead part of spotify-connect-resources's wiki?
Author
Owner

@sashahilton00 commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2018):

For now, lets put everything in the wiki. Structure not too important. Once we've implemented the main features in the backlog & solved the major bugs, we need to discuss documentation.

<!-- gh-comment-id:362068662 --> @sashahilton00 commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2018): For now, lets put everything in the wiki. Structure not too important. Once we've implemented the main features in the backlog & solved the major bugs, we need to discuss documentation.
Author
Owner

@ComlOnline commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2018):

Done, as its now in the wiki I think that the docs folder should now be removed.

<!-- gh-comment-id:362079045 --> @ComlOnline commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2018): Done, as its now in the wiki I think that the docs folder should now be removed.
Author
Owner

@sashahilton00 commented on GitHub (Feb 1, 2018):

Let's leave the docs folder for now, we'll clean it up later.

<!-- gh-comment-id:362116902 --> @sashahilton00 commented on GitHub (Feb 1, 2018): Let's leave the docs folder for now, we'll clean it up later.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/librespot#50
No description provided.