[GH-ISSUE #648] Add customized cookie support #414

Closed
opened 2026-03-02 11:49:38 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @Gnosnay on GitHub (Nov 12, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep/issues/648

Describe the feature you'd like

Add customized cookie support to make it possible that get the page which only is allowed access from logged users.

Describe the benefits this would bring to existing Hoarder users

more pages will be hoardered.

Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means?

No

Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue?

  • I have searched for existing issues and none cover my fundamental request

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @Gnosnay on GitHub (Nov 12, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep/issues/648 ### Describe the feature you'd like Add customized cookie support to make it possible that get the page which only is allowed access from logged users. ### Describe the benefits this would bring to existing Hoarder users more pages will be hoardered. ### Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means? No ### Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue? - [X] I have searched for existing issues and none cover my fundamental request ### Additional context _No response_
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-02 11:49:39 +03:00
Author
Owner

@Gnosnay commented on GitHub (Nov 12, 2024):

https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.cookieparam

we may use this method to do so

<!-- gh-comment-id:2471015311 --> @Gnosnay commented on GitHub (Nov 12, 2024): https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.cookieparam we may use this method to do so
Author
Owner

@MohamedBassem commented on GitHub (Nov 15, 2024):

I think we're more likely to do #172 instead.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2478441505 --> @MohamedBassem commented on GitHub (Nov 15, 2024): I think we're more likely to do #172 instead.
Author
Owner

@chenyucheng0503 commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2024):

I think we're more likely to do #172 instead.

Can REST API user also use #172 extension's method without opening Chrome?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2516953591 --> @chenyucheng0503 commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2024): > I think we're more likely to do #172 instead. Can REST API user also use #172 extension's method without opening Chrome?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/karakeep#414
No description provided.